Skip to content

checkpoint: into wallentx/termux-target from release/0.131.0 @ 7dc35e35215d#148

Merged
wallentx merged 13 commits into
wallentx/termux-targetfrom
checkpoint/wallentx_termux-target_from_release_0.131.0_7dc35e35215d
May 16, 2026
Merged

checkpoint: into wallentx/termux-target from release/0.131.0 @ 7dc35e35215d#148
wallentx merged 13 commits into
wallentx/termux-targetfrom
checkpoint/wallentx_termux-target_from_release_0.131.0_7dc35e35215d

Conversation

@unemployabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@unemployabot unemployabot Bot commented May 16, 2026

Termux release checkpoint

  • Source branch: release/0.131.0
  • Source hash: 7dc35e35215df4b76b1559779e87d055af1bb96d
  • Destination branch: wallentx/termux-target
  • Remaining first-parent commits on source: 0

This PR carries release-train conflict fixes and follow-up changes back into the reusable Termux patch branch.

Release-only workflow files and metadata under .github were restored to the destination branch versions before opening this PR.

bolinfest and others added 13 commits May 15, 2026 10:58
## Why

Sandbox telemetry tags should be derived from the active permission
profile, not from a legacy `SandboxPolicy`, so the tagging code stays
aligned with the permissions migration and does not preserve a
policy-shaped production helper only for tests.

## What Changed

- Removed the production `sandbox_tag(&SandboxPolicy, ...)` helper.
- Updated sandbox tag tests to construct the relevant
`PermissionProfile` values directly.
- Kept the platform-specific sandbox tag behavior under the existing
`permission_profile_sandbox_tag` path.

## How To Review

The production change is in `codex-rs/core/src/sandbox_tags.rs`. Most of
the diff is test cleanup that replaces legacy policy setup with
permission profiles, so review the expected tag assertions rather than
the old helper mechanics.

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-core sandbox_tag`









---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22791).
* openai#22795
* openai#22792
* __->__ openai#22791
This adds `apps_mcp_product_sku` as a toplevel config.toml key. We pass
the given value as a header when listing MCPs for the client, allowing
connectors to be filtered per product entry point.

---------

Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
## Why

The app-server thread lifecycle API should no longer expose the full
`PermissionProfile` value. After the permissions-profile migration,
clients should round-trip only the active profile identity through
`activePermissionProfile` and `permissions` when that identity is known.

The full profile is server-side config. Treating a response-derived
legacy sandbox projection as a new local profile can lose named-profile
restrictions and accidentally widen permissions on the next turn. The
legacy `sandbox` response field remains only as the
compatibility/display fallback.

## What Changed

- Removed `permissionProfile` from `ThreadStartResponse`,
`ThreadResumeResponse`, and `ThreadForkResponse`.
- Stopped populating that field in app-server thread start/resume/fork
responses.
- Updated embedded exec/TUI response mapping to derive display
permission state from local config or the legacy sandbox fallback
instead of a response profile value.
- Added a TUI turn override shape that distinguishes preserving server
permissions, selecting an active profile id, and sending a legacy
sandbox for an explicit local override.
- Preserved remote app-server permissions across turns by sending
`permissions` only when an `activePermissionProfile` id is known, and
otherwise sending no sandbox override unless the user selected a local
override.
- Kept embedded `thread/resume` hydration server-authored when
`activePermissionProfile` is absent, which matches the live-thread
attach path where the server ignores requested overrides.
- Updated the app-server README to remove the obsolete lifecycle
response `permissionProfile` reference. The remaining
`permissionProfile` README references are request-side permission
overrides.
- Regenerated app-server JSON schema and TypeScript fixtures.
- Kept the generated typed response enum exempt from
`large_enum_variant`, matching the existing payload enum exemption after
the lifecycle response variants shrank.

## How To Review

Start with `codex-rs/app-server-protocol/src/protocol/v2/thread.rs` to
confirm the response shape, then check the response construction in
`codex-rs/app-server/src/request_processors`. The generated schema and
TypeScript fixture changes are mechanical follow-through from the
protocol removal.

The TUI behavior is the delicate part: review
`codex-rs/tui/src/app_server_session.rs` for response hydration and
turn-start override projection, then
`codex-rs/tui/src/app/thread_routing.rs` for the decision about whether
the next turn should preserve the server snapshot, send an active
profile id, or send a legacy sandbox for an explicit local override.

## Verification

- `just write-app-server-schema`
- `cargo test -p codex-app-server-protocol
thread_lifecycle_responses_default_missing_optional_fields`
- `cargo test -p codex-exec
session_configured_from_thread_response_uses_permission_profile_from_config`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui --lib thread_response`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui turn_permissions_`
- `cargo test -p codex-tui
resume_response_restores_turns_from_thread_items`
- `cargo test -p codex-analytics
track_response_only_enqueues_analytics_relevant_responses`
- `just fix -p codex-analytics`
- `just fix -p codex-app-server-protocol`
- `just fix -p codex-tui`
- `just argument-comment-lint`

---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22792).
* openai#22795
* __->__ openai#22792
## Why

The core migration is trying to make `PermissionProfile` the shape tests
and runtime code reason about, leaving `SandboxPolicy` only where legacy
behavior is explicitly under test. The local
`permission_profile_for_sandbox_policy()` test helpers kept new
permission-profile tests mentally tied to the old sandbox model even
when the equivalent profile is straightforward.

## What Changed

- Removed the `permission_profile_for_sandbox_policy()` helper from the
network proxy spec tests and session tests.
- Replaced legacy conversions for read-only, workspace-write, and
full-access cases with `PermissionProfile::read_only()`,
`PermissionProfile::workspace_write()`, and
`PermissionProfile::Disabled`.
- Constructed the external-sandbox session test's
`PermissionProfile::External` directly, while preserving the legacy
`SandboxPolicy` only where the test still exercises legacy config update
behavior.

## How To Review

This PR is intentionally test-only. Review the two touched files and
check that each replacement preserves the old legacy mapping:

- `SandboxPolicy::new_read_only_policy()` ->
`PermissionProfile::read_only()`
- `SandboxPolicy::new_workspace_write_policy()` ->
`PermissionProfile::workspace_write()`
- `SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess` -> `PermissionProfile::Disabled`
- `SandboxPolicy::ExternalSandbox { network_access: Restricted }` ->
`PermissionProfile::External { network: Restricted }`

## Verification

- `cargo test -p codex-core
requirements_allowed_domains_are_a_baseline_for_user_allowlist`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
start_managed_network_proxy_applies_execpolicy_network_rules`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
session_configured_reports_permission_profile_for_external_sandbox`
- `cargo test -p codex-core
managed_network_proxy_decider_survives_full_access_start`
- `just fix -p codex-core`








---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/22795).
* openai#22891
* __->__ openai#22795
## Why
`promote_signed` is now used to finish a release from an externally
signed macOS handoff, but this release path (temporarily) no longer
distributes DMGs. Keeping DMG staging enabled made the handoff
unnecessarily require DMG assets and notarization/stapling validation
even though the promoted release only needs the signed macOS binaries.

## What changed
- Set every `stage-signed-macos` matrix entry to `build_dmg: "false"`,
including the primary macOS bundles.
- Kept the existing DMG staging branch in place behind
`matrix.build_dmg` so it can be re-enabled deliberately later.
- Updated the workflow header comment so the signed handoff contract
asks for signed binaries, not signed DMGs.

The regular signed build path that creates, signs, notarizes, and stages
DMGs is unchanged; this only affects the `promote_signed` handoff path.
)

## Why
To help improve `codex remote-control` CLI UX which I plan to do in a
followup, this PR adds `server-name` to the various remote control APIs:
- `remoteControl/enable`
- `remoteControl/disable`
- `remoteControl/status/changed`

Also, add a `remoteControl/status/read` API. This will be helpful in the
Codex App.
## Summary
- keep transcript-derived local thread metadata SQLite failures
best-effort
- preserve hard failures for explicit git-only metadata updates that
still require SQLite state
- add regression coverage for the soft-vs-hard metadata update policy

## Root cause
The live thread metadata sync introduced after v0.131.0-alpha.8 moved
append-derived metadata writes above the rollout writer. Those SQLite
writes now propagated through the live thread flush path, so a corrupted
optional state DB could surface as a transcript persistence warning even
when JSONL writes still succeeded.

The hard failures were introduced in openai#22236
…nt/wallentx_termux-target_from_release_0.131.0_7dc35e35215d

# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/rust-release.yml
#	.github/workflows/shell-tool-mcp.yml
#	codex-rs/Cargo.toml
#	scripts/termux-create-checkpoint-pr.sh
#	scripts/termux-download-release-artifact.sh
@unemployabot unemployabot Bot requested a review from wallentx May 16, 2026 03:52
@unemployabot unemployabot Bot added checkpoint Checkpoint merge termux-release Termux release automation labels May 16, 2026
@wallentx wallentx merged commit bd86487 into wallentx/termux-target May 16, 2026
1 check passed
@wallentx wallentx deleted the checkpoint/wallentx_termux-target_from_release_0.131.0_7dc35e35215d branch May 16, 2026 04:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

checkpoint Checkpoint merge termux-release Termux release automation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants