Group 2 Critique
Group 2 Critique
Group two's about page is very well done. The placement of the pictures is really good, and the UI looks engaging.
Group two's use of relevant logos in their about page allows the user to easily see the tools used as well as provide a link to each cool.
Their tables were clear, concise, and easy to parse through and understand.
Their home page was very funny.
Group two's project was essentially about authors, their most highly rated books, and the publisher's these books were published under.
We learned about good authors and the books that they wrote, as well as who published them.
We also learned a little bit about these authors, such as their birth year, their hometown, and when they first published a book.
The whole website was presented very well, in a clear and concise manner.
However, there was very little information actually gathered and presented. For example, we barely know anything about the authors, and we know virtually nothing about the books, except the title, and that it was the highest rated book by a particular author.
The main thing that puzzles us about Group two's website is why they chose to use the logo as the only way to link to the html pages for the publisher's and books, and the author's picture as the only way to link to the author's pages.