This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 18, 2026. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Proposed architecture
Clint Troxel edited this page Jan 24, 2020
·
3 revisions

Current Architecture image for comparison
Detailed Proposed Architecture image
The main focus of the to-be state is bypassing the TIM / FMMI and TIM / FPFS connections, and having OpenForest make use of a new REST API in FPFS.
REST APIs are the modern standard and are simpler to use than SOAP APIs. This new API is already being developed and is ready for OpenForest to prototype against.
- Handles a single permit, simplifying the current batch process and the underlying API technology
- Once fully functional should allow for the deprecation of firewood permitting functionality in:
- NRM Automated SFTP process
- NRM owned SOAP API
- FPFS owned SOAP API
- Additionally, FPFS data will continue to flow to FMMI as usual, so downstream data consumers should be unaffected.
- CDW and EDW reporting systems fetch data from TIMs Staging Tables.
- We will work with the EDW program manager to change their data sources from TIM to a more modern system.
- We think it makes sense for the new EDW data sources to be a combination of OpenForest and POSS, using REST APIs when possible.
Home
How we work
- Roles
- Team practices
- Sustainment plan
- Considerations when reviewing vendor proposals
- Open Forest Design System
- Accessibility checklist
- Usability Test Quality Heuristics
Technical information
Ongoing updates
Resources
User research
- Field trip 1: Observing frontliners and fuelwood permit purchasers at Mount Hood
- Firewood permit service blueprint, current state
- Field trip 2: Observing LEOs in the field
- Usability Test 1: Online permit buying flow and printable load tags
- Topline: Timber Permitting E&I interview
- Topline: Require Permit Information For Permittee
- Usability Test 2: Firewood Landing Page (September 2020)
- Usability Test 3: Load Tag (September 2020)