[28.x] Backports#35214
Merged
achow101 merged 3 commits intobitcoin:28.xfrom May 6, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. Code Coverage & BenchmarksFor details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/35214. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please copy-paste |
Docker 29.4.2 blocks `socketcall(2)` in the default seccomp profile: https://docs.docker.com/engine/release-notes/29/#2942 https://github.com/moby/profiles/releases/tag/seccomp%2Fv0.2.2 moby/moby#52501 That affects the `i686, no IPC` job because it runs 32-bit Linux test binaries inside Docker. Add Docker's documented `--security-opt seccomp=unconfined` workaround to this job's `CI_CONTAINER_CAP` - the hook `ci/test/02_run_container.py` already appends to `docker run`. This restores socket availability for the 32-bit test binaries throughout the job: https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/seccomp/#run-without-the-default-seccomp-profile Github-Pull: bitcoin#35202 Rebased-From: 11c9ef9
Member
|
#35175 please so I can compile this |
This effectively reverts a3cb309 from PR bitcoin#30194. That PR reduced the multi_index type signatures as recommended upstream, but this is no longer supported as of boost 1.91 because it is no longer necessary. 1.91 drops support for the pre-c++11 work-arounds that bloated the type signatures to begin with. The upstream `BOOST_MULTI_INDEX_ENABLE_MPL_SUPPORT` define is meant to provide compatibility with removed features, but it does not work for this case. Using `indexed_by` directly when defining the `multi_index` (as opposed to inheriting from it) works with all versions, and avoids the use of the back-compat define. This is a slight regression when building against boost < 1.91 because the bloated type signatures are reintroduced in that case, but it's not significant enough to go to the trouble of introducing version detection and ifdefs. Github-Pull: bitcoin#35175 Rebased-From: 0bc9d35
Member
|
ACK c1c2184 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backports:
i686, no IPCjob #35202