Skip to content

Clarify that redeemScript is often optional#4513

Merged
laanwj merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
zw:signraw
Jul 14, 2014
Merged

Clarify that redeemScript is often optional#4513
laanwj merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
zw:signraw

Conversation

@zw
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@zw zw commented Jul 12, 2014

If described as "required", folks like me who know only enough to be dangerous sit there scratching our heads/trawling the web for a while trying to work out what to put there and where to get it from (although recently I spotted that the developer docs have an example of not supplying it).

@BitcoinPullTester
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automatic sanity-testing: PASSED, see http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/p4513_6265ecc87f766faad4b950ea0c89e77e0e7e076a/ for binaries and test log.
This test script verifies pulls every time they are updated. It, however, dies sometimes and fails to test properly. If you are waiting on a test, please check timestamps to verify that the test.log is moving at http://jenkins.bluematt.me/pull-tester/current/
Contact BlueMatt on freenode if something looks broken.

@sipa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

sipa commented Jul 12, 2014

ACK

1 similar comment
@fanquake
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ACK

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 6265ecc into bitcoin:master Jul 14, 2014
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2014
6265ecc Clarify that redeemScript is often optional (Zak Wilcox)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants