Improve instructions and tests for Remote Control Competition exercise

[eneuschild]

Improve instructions and tests for Remote Control Competition exercise

Issue #2164 points out that Remote Control Competition's instructions don't match its tests very well. This PR is an attempt to improve this.

Completing each instruction subsection now increases the number of passing tests, which wasn't given previously.

Open Questions

• I have not yet touched the tests themselves, as I feel this would be too big a change for a single (first) PR. Would you agree?
  • Update: Since @SleeplessByte disagreed with this assessment, I have now introduced more tests that gradually guide the student to a complete solution.
• The way I understand the Updating the README section of the CONTRIBUTING.md, I should be running configlet to maintain README files. Am I understanding correctly that this isn't really applicable here because this exercise is not part of the more generic problem specifications? 🤔

---

Reviewer Resources:

Track Policies

[eneuschild]

Hi @kytrinyx, any advice on how to get this to the next step? 🙂

[kytrinyx]

@eneuschild I recommend starting a conversation on the forum: https://forum.exercism.org/

In the past few months, most successful contributions happen by first discussing on the forum, in order to get clarity on what, exactly, the problem is, as well as how to approach resolving it. Once that is done, opening a PR is more of a formality.

[kytrinyx]

@eneuschild I just saw your post in the forum (https://forum.exercism.org/t/getting-pr-to-java-track-reviewed/4913). I'm not a track maintainer, so I'm not the right person to review this.

@andrerfcsantos Do you know what the status is in the Java track these days?

[eneuschild]

Thanks for the pointers, @kytrinyx! 💐 I'll try to stick to that process in the future! 🙂

[SleeplessByte]

The changes here look sensible. I would recommend to also make the tests changes in THIS PR, because otherwise they become unrelated changes.

[eneuschild]

@SleeplessByte Thanks for your feedback!
I have now added some more tests that allow a more gradual approach to a working all-green solution.

Please have another look! 🙂

[SleeplessByte]

Looks good.