[path_parsing] Fix deprecation lints - #12704
Conversation
|
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests or get an explicit test exemption before merging. If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix? Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. If you believe this PR qualifies for a test exemption, contact "@test-exemption-reviewer" in the #hackers channel in Discord (don't just cc them here, they won't see it!). The test exemption team is a small volunteer group, so all reviewers should feel empowered to ask for tests, without delegating that responsibility entirely to the test exemption group. |
|
I would think this is a situation where we cannot write tests and the existing ones are used to catch regressions? Also, I updated the entry What do you think? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the path_parsing package to address deprecation lints by replacing deprecated scale calls with scaledByDouble in SvgPathNormalizer. The review feedback suggests simplifying the scaledByDouble calls by passing 1.0 for both the Z and W scale factors, as these components are unused in 2D mapping.
| pointTransform.setIdentity(); | ||
|
|
||
| pointTransform.scale(1.0 / rx, 1.0 / ry); | ||
| pointTransform.scaledByDouble(1.0 / rx, 1.0 / ry, 1.0 / rx, 1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is a 2D transformation and the Z/W components are completely unused by _mapPoint, we can pass 1.0 for both the Z and W scale factors instead of 1.0 / rx and 1. This is cleaner, more explicit, and avoids unnecessary calculations.
| pointTransform.scaledByDouble(1.0 / rx, 1.0 / ry, 1.0 / rx, 1); | |
| pointTransform.scaledByDouble(1.0 / rx, 1.0 / ry, 1.0, 1.0); |
| pointTransform.setIdentity(); | ||
| pointTransform.rotateZ(angle); | ||
| pointTransform.scale(rx, ry); | ||
| pointTransform.scaledByDouble(rx, ry, rx, 1); |
aa1d8e2 to
a28acb6
Compare
andywolff
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I noticed that the analyze downgraded test failed with
The method 'scaleByDouble' isn't defined for the type 'Matrix4'.
Matrix4.scaleByDouble was introduced in vector_math 2.2.0, but path_parsing/pubspec.yaml currently specifies vector_math: ^2.1.0. Please update this to ^2.2.0. Also please update the note in the changelog to use third person present tense and mention the vector_math version increment, like "Fixes deprecation lints and updates minimum vector_math dependency."
0606bdd to
7d7327b
Compare
…r#192191) flutter/packages@7a7912f...18fe786 2026-09-02 32538273+ValentinVignal@users.noreply.github.com [path_parsing] Fix deprecation lints (flutter/packages#12704) 2026-09-02 srawlins@google.com [material_ui] Use super parameters in more places (flutter/packages#12460) 2026-09-02 21270878+elliette@users.noreply.github.com [material_ui] Add a README and placeholders for migrating gen_defaults templates (flutter/packages#12714) 2026-09-01 victor.orozco@cloudsufi.com [image_picker] Add native tests for image, metadata, photo-asset, and PHPicker save utilities (flutter/packages#12536) 2026-09-01 lozhkovoi@gmail.com [material_ui] Port routes_transition_test to material_ui (flutter/packages#12634) 2026-09-01 engine-flutter-autoroll@skia.org Roll Flutter from c8c5e3b to 0cbd1a4 (23 revisions) (flutter/packages#12712) 2026-09-01 32538273+ValentinVignal@users.noreply.github.com [material_ui] Remove !chrome in text_field_test.dart (flutter/packages#12548) If this roll has caused a breakage, revert this CL and stop the roller using the controls here: https://autoroll.skia.org/r/flutter-packages-flutter-autoroll Please CC flutter-ecosystem@google.com on the revert to ensure that a human is aware of the problem. To file a bug in Flutter: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/new/choose To report a problem with the AutoRoller itself, please file a bug: https://issues.skia.org/issues/new?component=1389291&template=1850622 Documentation for the AutoRoller is here: https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+doc/main/autoroll/README.md
Part of flutter/flutter#178120
Pre-Review Checklist
[shared_preferences]///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.
Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of Gemini Code Assist for GitHub. Comments from the
gemini-code-assistbot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed.Footnotes
Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. ↩ ↩2