Conversation
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19392
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c31129d to
d51f2b9
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19393
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6481b36 to
fc44eac
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19393
branch
2 times, most recently
from
bb5e9e1 to
2665e60
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19392
branch
2 times, most recently
from
37ef901 to
f805b17
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19393
branch
2 times, most recently
from
79f119e to
7989a49
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19392
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a28edf9 to
eb0ab78
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19392
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e8e9902 to
6832fed
Compare
bolinfest
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
## Why The profile conversion path still required a `cwd` even when it was only translating a legacy `SandboxPolicy` into a `PermissionProfile`. That made profile producers invent an ambient `cwd`, which is exactly the anchoring we are trying to remove from permission-profile data. A legacy workspace-write policy can be represented symbolically instead: `:cwd = write` plus read-only `:project_roots` metadata subpaths. This PR creates that cwd-free base so the rest of the stack can stop threading cwd through profile construction. Callers that actually need a concrete runtime filesystem policy for a specific cwd still have an explicitly named cwd-bound conversion. ## What Changed - `PermissionProfile::from_legacy_sandbox_policy` now takes only `&SandboxPolicy`. - `FileSystemSandboxPolicy::from_legacy_sandbox_policy` is now the symbolic, cwd-free projection for profiles. - The old concrete projection is retained as `FileSystemSandboxPolicy::from_legacy_sandbox_policy_for_cwd` for runtime/boundary code that must materialize legacy cwd behavior. - Workspace-write profiles preserve `CurrentWorkingDirectory` and `ProjectRoots` special entries instead of materializing cwd into absolute paths. ## Verification - `cargo check -p codex-protocol -p codex-core -p codex-app-server-protocol -p codex-app-server -p codex-exec -p codex-exec-server -p codex-tui -p codex-sandboxing -p codex-linux-sandbox -p codex-analytics --tests` - `just fix -p codex-protocol -p codex-core -p codex-app-server-protocol -p codex-app-server -p codex-exec -p codex-exec-server -p codex-tui -p codex-sandboxing -p codex-linux-sandbox -p codex-analytics` --- [//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER) Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/openai/codex/pull/19414). * #19395 * #19394 * #19393 * #19392 * #19391 * __->__ #19414
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19393
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2aacd05 to
e9d571f
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19392
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9c16a43 to
747398e
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19393
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7ef8fba to
a655a3e
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19393
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b55d950 to
828b90d
Compare
bolinfest
force-pushed
the
pr19392
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ac08756 to
6ceba5b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Runtime decisions should not infer permissions from the lossy legacy sandbox projection once
PermissionProfileis available. In particular,DisabledandExternalneed to remain distinct, and managed profiles with split filesystem or deny-read rules should not be collapsed before approval, network, safety, or analytics code makes decisions.What Changed
PermissionProfilewhen deciding whether a managed sandbox is active.PermissionProfilerather than a strictSandboxPolicyround trip.Verification
cargo test -p codex-core direct_write_rootscargo test -p codex-core runtime_roots_to_legacy_projectioncargo test -p codex-app-server requested_permissions_trust_project_uses_permission_profile_intentStack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.