feat: add $expand=children to the driveItem stat operations - #68
Merged
Conversation
dschmidt
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 1, 2026 17:48
dschmidt
requested review from
butonic,
dragotin,
fschade,
kulmann,
micbar and
rhafer
as code owners
September 1, 2026 17:48
kulmann
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
$expand=childrento the four operations that stat a single driveItem or a drive root:GetDriveItem(v1beta1),GetDriveItemV1,GetRoot,HomeGetRoot.The
childrenproperty already exists on thedriveItemschema, only the query parameter was missing, so this is purely additive.Motivation: a folder listing currently needs two round trips against graph (stat the folder, then list its children), where a single WebDAV
PROPFINDwithDepth: 1returns the collection and its children at once. With$expand=childrenclients get back to one request. The server ignores the parameter today, so this needs an implementation to follow.