Conversation
feat: add pwa support
fix: request pay issues
…eive fix: Change Total to You will receive to make it clear UX
…upport Revert "feat: add pwa support"
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve multiple components across the application that have been updated to utilize the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/constants/loadingStates.consts.ts (1)
11-11: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of 'Awaiting route fulfillment' to the
LoadingStatestype is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives for Request flow fixes. The new state is logically placed and follows the existing naming convention.For improved clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose or context of this new loading state. For example:
// State when waiting for the route to be fulfilled after fetching | 'Awaiting route fulfillment'This would help developers understand when and why this state is used in the Request flow.
src/components/Global/AddressLink/index.tsx (1)
19-25: Consider adding rel attribute for better security and accessibility.The rendering logic is well-implemented, but there's a minor improvement that could be made for security and accessibility:
When using
target="_blank"for external links, it's recommended to also includerel="noopener noreferrer"to prevent potential security vulnerabilities and improve accessibility. Here's the suggested change:- <Link className="cursor-pointer underline" href={url} target="_blank"> + <Link className="cursor-pointer underline" href={url} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">This change helps prevent potential exploitation of the
window.openerobject and follows best practices for external links.src/components/Dashboard/components/MobileComponent.tsx (2)
48-50: Approved: Good use of AddressLink component.The implementation of
AddressLinkenhances the UI by potentially making the address interactive. The fallback to theaddressprop is maintained, which is good for error handling.Consider wrapping the "From:" label in a
<span>for consistency and easier styling if needed:<label> - From: <AddressLink address={linkDetail.address ?? address} /> + <span>From:</span> <AddressLink address={linkDetail.address ?? address} /> </label>
2-2: Summary: Positive enhancement to address display.The introduction of the
AddressLinkcomponent improves the user interface by potentially making addresses interactive or navigable. This change is well-implemented and doesn't disrupt the existing component structure or logic.To further improve the component:
- Consider adding a prop to
MobileItemComponentto toggle the use ofAddressLink. This would make the component more flexible for different use cases.- If
AddressLinkadds significant bundle size, consider lazy-loading it to optimize performance.Example of adding a prop:
export const MobileItemComponent = ({ linkDetail, address, useAddressLink = true, // New prop with default value }: { linkDetail: interfaces.IDashboardItem address: string useAddressLink?: boolean // New prop type }) => { // ... {useAddressLink ? ( <AddressLink address={linkDetail.address ?? address} /> ) : ( utils.printableAddress(linkDetail.address ?? address) )} // ... }Also applies to: 48-50
src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (1)
Line range hint
111-116: Remove redundantsetIsFetchingTokenData(true)and LGTM on state resetsThe state resets before fetching new data are good practice, aligning with the learning from PR #413 about discarding stale data. However, the
setIsFetchingTokenData(true)call on line 111 is redundant, as it's already set in thefetchAndSetTokenPricefunction.Consider removing the redundant call:
- setIsFetchingTokenData(true) setSelectedTokenData(undefined) setSelectedTokenPrice(undefined) setSelectedTokenDecimals(undefined) setInputDenomination('TOKEN') fetchAndSetTokenPrice(selectedTokenAddress, selectedChainID)The state resets are approved and align with best practices for managing token data updates.
src/components/Request/Pay/Pay.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM! Consider optimizing imports.The addition of
useContextand the context module is appropriate for implementing context-based state management. However, consider importing only the necessary parts of the context module to potentially reduce bundle size.If you're only using
loadingStateContextfrom the context module, you could optimize the import like this:import { loadingStateContext } from '@/context'Also applies to: 10-10
60-60: Consider dynamic loading state management.Setting the loading state to 'Idle' after navigation is good for user feedback. However, it might not accurately reflect the loading state of the next view.
Consider implementing a more dynamic approach:
- Set a 'Loading' state before transitioning to the next view.
- Allow each view to manage its own loading state and update the global state accordingly.
This could provide a more accurate representation of the application's state during transitions.
Also applies to: 70-70
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
188-188: LGTM: Improved address rendering with AddressLink component.The use of the
AddressLinkcomponent enhances the display of the recipient's address. The fallback logic using the nullish coalescing operator is a good practice.Consider adding a prop to handle cases where both
recipient.nameandrecipient.addressare falsy:<AddressLink address={recipient.name ?? recipient.address ?? ''} fallback="No address available" />This would provide a more informative message to the user in case of missing data.
src/utils/general.utils.ts (1)
238-242: New function added:formatAmountWithSignificantDigitsThe new function
formatAmountWithSignificantDigitsis a useful addition to the utility file. It formats a number to a specified number of significant digits, which can be helpful for displaying currency amounts or other numerical values with precision.Some observations:
- The function correctly calculates the number of fraction digits based on the logarithm of the amount.
- It ensures that the fraction digits are non-negative, which is a good safeguard.
- The function uses
toFixed()to format the number, which is appropriate for this use case.Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding input validation to ensure
amountis a positive number andsignificantDigitsis a positive integer.- Add a brief JSDoc comment to explain the function's purpose and parameters.
Example implementation with suggestions:
/** * Formats a number to a specified number of significant digits. * @param amount The number to format * @param significantDigits The number of significant digits to display * @returns A string representation of the formatted number * @throws {Error} If amount is not a positive number or significantDigits is not a positive integer */ export function formatAmountWithSignificantDigits(amount: number, significantDigits: number): string { if (amount <= 0 || !Number.isFinite(amount)) { throw new Error('Amount must be a positive number'); } if (!Number.isInteger(significantDigits) || significantDigits <= 0) { throw new Error('Significant digits must be a positive integer'); } let fractionDigits = Math.max(0, Math.floor(Math.log10(1 / amount)) + significantDigits); return amount.toFixed(fractionDigits); }This implementation adds input validation and a JSDoc comment for better documentation and error handling.
src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
678-701: Consider refactoring for improved readability and maintainabilityWhile the current implementation works, there's an opportunity to enhance code readability and maintainability:
- Extract fee calculation into a separate function.
- Create a helper function for formatting the final amount.
- Simplify the conditional logic using early returns or a more concise structure.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const getFee = (accountType: string) => accountType === 'iban' ? 1 : 0.5; const formatFinalAmount = (amount: number, fee: number) => utils.formatTokenAmount(amount - fee); const renderFinalAmount = () => { const account = user?.accounts.find(acc => acc.account_identifier === offrampForm.recipient); if (!account) return null; const fee = getFee(account.account_type); let amount: number; if (offrampType === OfframpType.CASHOUT) { amount = parseFloat(usdValue ?? tokenValue ?? '0'); } else if (tokenPrice && claimLinkData) { amount = tokenPrice * parseFloat(claimLinkData.tokenAmount); } else { return null; } return ( <> ${formatFinalAmount(amount, fee)} <MoreInfo text={`A fee of $${fee} is charged for ${account.account_type.toUpperCase()} transactions. This will be deducted from the amount you receive.`} /> </> ); }; // In the JSX: <span className="flex flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-center text-sm font-normal leading-4"> {renderFinalAmount()} </span>This refactored version improves readability, reduces duplication, and makes the code easier to maintain and test.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Dashboard/components/MobileComponent.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Global/AddressLink/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Profile/Components/TableComponent.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Profile/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Pay.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (10 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/constants/loadingStates.consts.ts (1 hunks)
- src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/utils/general.utils.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (5)
Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T14:57:44.520Z Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:44.480Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(estimatedGasCost, 3)` return strings, ensuring consistent return types for `calculatedFee`.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(estimatedGasCost, 3)` return strings, ensuring consistent return types for `calculatedFee`.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-07T15:28:25.280Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(estimatedGasCost, 3)` return strings, ensuring consistent return types for `calculatedFee`.src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx (3)
Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#409 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx:23-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T12:52:52.740Z Learning: In the `SuccessView` component, `transactionHash` remains constant because we are in a success view, so it's unnecessary to include it in the dependency array of `useEffect` hooks.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#409 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx:23-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: In the `SuccessView` component, `transactionHash` remains constant because we are in a success view, so it's unnecessary to include it in the dependency array of `useEffect` hooks.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#409 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx:23-23 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:44.480Z Learning: In the `SuccessView` component, `transactionHash` remains constant because we are in a success view, so it's unnecessary to include it in the dependency array of `useEffect` hooks.src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (4)
Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#404 File: src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx:121-121 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: In `TokenContextProvider` within `tokenSelector.context.tsx`, when token data is loaded from preferences, it's acceptable to set `isTokenPriceFetchingComplete` to `true` because the token data is already available.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#404 File: src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx:121-121 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T09:57:43.885Z Learning: In `TokenContextProvider` within `tokenSelector.context.tsx`, when token data is loaded from preferences, it's acceptable to set `isTokenPriceFetchingComplete` to `true` because the token data is already available.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#413 File: src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx:118-123 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: In the `TokenContextProvider` component within `src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx`, in the TypeScript React application, when data changes and before calling `fetchAndSetTokenPrice`, it is necessary to reset `selectedTokenData`, `selectedTokenPrice`, `selectedTokenDecimals`, and `inputDenomination` to discard stale data.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#413 File: src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx:118-123 Timestamp: 2024-10-04T13:40:16.067Z Learning: In the `TokenContextProvider` component within `src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx`, in the TypeScript React application, when data changes and before calling `fetchAndSetTokenPrice`, it is necessary to reset `selectedTokenData`, `selectedTokenPrice`, `selectedTokenDecimals`, and `inputDenomination` to discard stale data.
🔇 Additional comments (24)
src/components/Global/AddressLink/index.tsx (3)
1-4: LGTM: Imports and utility functions are well-organized.The imports are appropriate for the component's functionality, and the use of a local utility module promotes good code organization.
6-7: LGTM: Component definition and state initialization are well-implemented.The component is defined as a functional component with proper TypeScript prop typing, and the useState hook is correctly used for state management.
28-28: LGTM: Component export is correctly implemented.The AddressLink component is properly exported as the default export, following React best practices.
src/components/Dashboard/components/MobileComponent.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: New import statement is correct.The import statement for
AddressLinkis properly formatted and follows React best practices.src/context/tokenSelector.context.tsx (4)
28-28: LGTM: Addition ofisFetchingTokenDatato the contextThe addition of
isFetchingTokenDatato the context is a good improvement. It allows components consuming this context to react to the fetching state, potentially showing loading indicators or disabling certain actions while data is being retrieved.
43-43: LGTM: State declaration forisFetchingTokenDataThe state declaration for
isFetchingTokenDatais well-implemented. It uses the correct type annotation and initializes withfalse, which is consistent with the context's initial value.
Line range hint
69-101: LGTM: Proper management ofisFetchingTokenDatastateThe changes in the
fetchAndSetTokenPricefunction correctly manage theisFetchingTokenDatastate:
- Setting it to
trueat the start of the function.- Using a
finallyblock to set it back tofalse, ensuring it's reset regardless of the outcome.This implementation follows best practices for managing loading states in asynchronous operations.
151-151: LGTM: ExposingisFetchingTokenDatain the context providerThe addition of
isFetchingTokenDatato the context provider value is correct and consistent with the earlier changes. This makes the fetching state available to all components consuming this context, allowing for more responsive UI updates during data loading.src/components/Request/Pay/Pay.tsx (2)
25-25: LGTM! Good use of context for managing loading state.The implementation of
useContextto accesssetLoadingStatefrom theloadingStateContextis correct and follows React best practices for state management across components.
Line range hint
1-190: Summary: Improved state management with context implementationThe changes to this component enhance its ability to manage loading states across the application using React's Context API. This is a positive step towards more centralized state management.
Key improvements:
- Integration of
useContextfor accessing the loading state context.- Implementation of loading state updates in navigation functions.
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Optimize context imports for potential bundle size reduction.
- Consider a more dynamic approach to loading state management during view transitions.
Overall, these changes contribute to better state management and potentially improved user experience.
src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx (1)
115-115: Improved clarity in transaction details displayThe label change from "Total" to "You will receive" enhances user understanding by explicitly stating what the displayed amount represents. This modification aligns well with the goal of improving clarity in the user interface.
src/components/Dashboard/index.tsx (3)
6-6: LGTM: AddressLink import added correctly.The import statement for the AddressLink component is properly placed and correctly uses a relative path. This new import aligns with the changes made in the address rendering within the table.
Line range hint
1-265: Summary: Address rendering improvement with minimal impact.The changes in this file are focused and beneficial:
- A new AddressLink component is imported.
- The address rendering in the table is updated to use this new component.
These modifications are part of a larger effort to standardize address display across the application, as mentioned in the PR summary. The changes are minimal and unlikely to introduce any breaking changes or performance issues. The overall structure and functionality of the Dashboard component remain intact.
To ensure consistency across the application, consider the following action:
Run this script to check for any remaining instances of
utils.printableAddressthat might need updating:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find remaining instances of utils.printableAddress # Test: Search for utils.printableAddress usage rg --type typescript 'utils\.printableAddress'If any instances are found, consider updating them to use the new AddressLink component for consistency.
188-188: LGTM: Address rendering enhanced with AddressLink component.The use of the AddressLink component improves the address display in the table. The existing fallback logic using the nullish coalescing operator is preserved, maintaining consistency with the previous implementation.
Please verify that the AddressLink component correctly handles an empty string input. Run the following script to check its implementation:
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM: New import for AddressLink component.The import statement for the
AddressLinkcomponent is correctly placed and uses the appropriate alias path.
Line range hint
1-288: Summary: Successful integration of AddressLink component.The changes in this file successfully integrate the
AddressLinkcomponent for rendering the recipient's address in theConfirmClaimLinkView. This aligns with the PR objectives of standardizing address display across the application. The implementation maintains existing functionality while potentially enhancing the user interface and interaction with addresses.No other significant changes were made to the component's logic or structure, which helps maintain the overall integrity of the
ConfirmClaimLinkViewcomponent.src/components/Profile/Components/TableComponent.tsx (3)
6-6: LGTM: New import statement for AddressLink component.The import statement for the
AddressLinkcomponent is correctly placed and follows the project's import conventions.
Line range hint
1-265: Overall assessment: Good improvement in address rendering.The changes in this file are minimal and focused, improving the rendering of addresses by using the
AddressLinkcomponent. The overall structure and functionality of theTableComponentremain intact, and the changes are consistent with the component's purpose. Good job on enhancing the user interface without introducing complexity.
112-112: LGTM: Improved address rendering with AddressLink component.The change from
utils.printableAddressto theAddressLinkcomponent likely enhances the display and functionality of addresses in the table. This is a good improvement for user experience.Please ensure that the
AddressLinkcomponent handles empty strings appropriately. You can verify this by checking its implementation or by testing the TableComponent with null or undefined address values.src/components/Profile/index.tsx (1)
4-4: New import for AddressLink component added.The import statement for the AddressLink component is correctly placed and follows the existing import structure.
src/utils/general.utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-243: Overall assessment of changesThe addition of the
formatAmountWithSignificantDigitsfunction is a valuable enhancement to the utility module. It provides a useful method for formatting numbers with precision, which can be particularly helpful in financial or scientific applications.The function is well-placed within the file, following other number formatting utilities like
formatAmountandformatAmountWithDecimals. This maintains good organization and makes it easy for developers to find and use related functions.No other changes were made to the file, which helps maintain the stability of existing code. The new function integrates seamlessly with the existing utilities without introducing any conflicts or inconsistencies.
To further improve the module, consider:
- Adding unit tests for the new function to ensure its correctness across various input ranges.
- Updating any relevant documentation or README files to mention this new utility function.
- Reviewing other parts of the codebase where this new function might be useful and consider refactoring those areas to use it.
Overall, this is a solid addition to the utility module that enhances its functionality without introducing risks to existing code.
src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
678-679: Improved clarity in label textThe change from "Total" to "You will receive" enhances user understanding by explicitly stating what the displayed amount represents. This modification aligns with the goal of improving clarity in the user interface.
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx (1)
53-72: Remove unnecessary dependencies from useEffect's dependency arrayAs per previous learnings, in the
SuccessViewcomponent,transactionHashremains constant because we are in a success view. Including it in the dependency array of theuseEffecthook starting at line 53 is unnecessary and can lead to unwanted re-renders. Consider removingtransactionHashfrom the dependency array.src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (1)
293-297:⚠️ Potential issueAdd a null check for 'selectedTokenData' before using it
In the
handleOnNextfunction,selectedTokenData!is used with a non-null assertion operator. IfselectedTokenDataisundefined, this will cause a runtime error. To prevent this, add a check to ensureselectedTokenDatais defined before proceeding.Apply this diff to include the null check:
+ if (!selectedTokenData) { + setErrorState({ showError: true, errorMessage: 'Token data is missing.' }) + return + } const xchainUnsignedTxs = await createXChainUnsignedTx({ tokenData: selectedTokenData!, requestLink: requestLinkData, senderAddress: address ?? '', })⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Hugo0 PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#413 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:71-72 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, it's acceptable to use the `!` operator in TypeScript to assert that `selectedTokenData` is not `null` or `undefined`, and potential runtime errors from accessing its properties without checks can be disregarded.Learnt from: Hugo0 PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#413 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:71-72 Timestamp: 2024-10-04T13:10:49.199Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, it's acceptable to use the `!` operator in TypeScript to assert that `selectedTokenData` is not `null` or `undefined`, and potential runtime errors from accessing its properties without checks can be disregarded.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (!address) return | ||
| if (address.endsWith('.eth')) { | ||
| utils.resolveFromEnsName(address).then((resolvedAddress) => { | ||
| if (!resolvedAddress) return | ||
| setUrl(`https://debank.com/profile/${resolvedAddress}`) | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| setUrl(`https://debank.com/profile/${address}`) | ||
| }, [address]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving error handling and code organization.
The useEffect hook and URL generation logic are generally well-implemented, but there are a few areas for improvement:
-
Error handling: The ENS resolution process doesn't handle errors explicitly. Consider adding error handling to provide feedback if resolution fails.
-
Code organization: The URL generation logic could be moved to a separate function for better readability and testability.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
const generateUrl = async (address: string): Promise<string> => {
if (address.endsWith('.eth')) {
try {
const resolvedAddress = await utils.resolveFromEnsName(address);
return resolvedAddress ? `https://debank.com/profile/${resolvedAddress}` : '';
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error resolving ENS name:', error);
return '';
}
}
return `https://debank.com/profile/${address}`;
};
useEffect(() => {
if (!address) return;
generateUrl(address).then(setUrl);
}, [address]);This refactoring improves error handling and separates the URL generation logic, making the code more maintainable and easier to test.
| }} | ||
| /> | ||
| {utils.printableAddress(referral.address)} | ||
| <AddressLink address={referral.address} /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent Usage of AddressLink Component
While the AddressLink component is correctly implemented in several files, there are multiple instances where addresses are still rendered using utils.printableAddress. To ensure consistency across the codebase, please update these occurrences to use the AddressLink component:
src/components/Dashboard/index.tsxsrc/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsxsrc/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsxsrc/components/Dashboard/components/MobileComponent.tsxsrc/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsxsrc/components/Global/AddressLink/index.tsxsrc/components/Create/Link/Success.view.tsx
🔗 Analysis chain
AddressLink component used for rendering referral addresses.
The AddressLink component is correctly implemented to replace the previous address rendering method. This change enhances the display of addresses and is consistent with the pull request objectives.
To ensure consistent usage across the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining instances where addresses are rendered without using the AddressLink component, ensuring consistency across the codebase.
Adjustment Needed for Shell Scripts to Verify AddressLink Usage Consistently
The previous shell scripts encountered errors due to unrecognized file types. Please use the corrected scripts below to verify the consistent usage of the AddressLink component:
Correction Needed for Shell Scripts to Verify AddressLink Usage Consistently
The previous shell scripts encountered errors due to incorrect rg command syntax. Please use the corrected scripts below to verify the consistent usage of the AddressLink component:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of AddressLink component
# Search for instances where addresses are rendered without AddressLink
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'utils\.printableAddress\(' -g '!src/components/Profile/index.tsx'
# Search for imports of AddressLink in other files
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'import.*AddressLink.*from' -g '!src/components/Profile/index.tsx'
Length of output: 271
Script:
#
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of AddressLink component
# Search for instances where addresses are rendered without AddressLink
rg -e ts -e tsx 'utils\.printableAddress\(' --glob '!src/components/Profile/index.tsx'
# Search for imports of AddressLink in other files
rg -e ts -e tsx 'import.*AddressLink.*from' --glob '!src/components/Profile/index.tsx'
Length of output: 309
Script:
#
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of AddressLink component
# Search for instances where addresses are rendered without AddressLink
rg -e 'utils\.printableAddress\(' -e 'import.*AddressLink.*from' --glob '!src/components/Profile/index.tsx' .
Length of output: 1705
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (isXChain) { | ||
| setLoadingState('Awaiting route fulfillment') | ||
| fetchDestinationChain(transactionHash, setExplorerUrlDestChainWithTxHash) | ||
| } | ||
| }, []) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Include isXChain in the useEffect dependency array
The useEffect hook starting at line 74 uses isXChain, but it has an empty dependency array. If isXChain can change, it should be included in the dependency array to ensure the effect runs when isXChain changes.
| viewState === ViewState.LOADING || | ||
| viewState === ViewState.ERROR || | ||
| (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && !calculatedFee) | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle 'calculatedFee' correctly when it is '0'
In the condition for disabling the button, using !calculatedFee will evaluate to true when calculatedFee is '0', which is a valid fee amount. This will incorrectly disable the button when the fee is zero. To fix this, check for empty strings or undefined values explicitly.
Apply this diff to ensure the button is enabled when calculatedFee is '0':
- (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && !calculatedFee)
+ (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && (calculatedFee === '' || calculatedFee === undefined))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| viewState === ViewState.LOADING || | |
| viewState === ViewState.ERROR || | |
| (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && !calculatedFee) | |
| ) | |
| viewState === ViewState.LOADING || | |
| viewState === ViewState.ERROR || | |
| (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && (calculatedFee === '' || calculatedFee === undefined)) | |
| ) |
| const isButtonDisabled = useMemo(() => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| viewState === ViewState.LOADING || | ||
| viewState === ViewState.ERROR || | ||
| (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && !calculatedFee) | ||
| ) | ||
| }, [viewState, isLoading, calculatedFee]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary dependency 'isLoading' in 'isButtonDisabled' useMemo
The isButtonDisabled useMemo includes isLoading in its dependency array, but isLoading is not used within the function body. This can lead to unnecessary re-computations when isLoading changes. Consider removing isLoading from the dependency array.
Apply this diff to adjust the dependencies:
-}, [viewState, isLoading, calculatedFee])
+}, [viewState, calculatedFee])📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const isButtonDisabled = useMemo(() => { | |
| return ( | |
| viewState === ViewState.LOADING || | |
| viewState === ViewState.ERROR || | |
| (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && !calculatedFee) | |
| ) | |
| }, [viewState, isLoading, calculatedFee]) | |
| const isButtonDisabled = useMemo(() => { | |
| return ( | |
| viewState === ViewState.LOADING || | |
| viewState === ViewState.ERROR || | |
| (viewState === ViewState.READY_TO_PAY && !calculatedFee) | |
| ) | |
| }, [viewState, calculatedFee]) |
4 participants
No description provided.