[6.x] Pass field prefix to custom conditions - #15044
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request fixes an issue where custom field conditions had no way of knowing which prefixed instance of an imported fieldset they were being evaluated for.
When a fieldset containing a custom condition is imported into a blueprint multiple times with different prefixes, the condition function receives the same
valuespayload for every instance, making it impossible to scope the condition to the fields of the relevant fieldset instance.This PR fixes it by passing the field's
prefixinto the custom condition payload, allowing conditions to be scoped dynamically:Fixes #8439