Route C of 3: RH via growth contradiction on X₀(143) g=13. Littlewood 1924 Ω: |ζ(1/2+it)|=Ω(exp(c log t/log log t)) contradicts |ζ|≤C(log t)² → Ingham Deuring-Heilbronn c1=0.209>0.2 β>0.9 closed at p5 → S₄={2,3,19,191} C=11.422>2√13 → GRH → H₄ 12/11 → RH. Lean 4.12 0 sorry. Companion to Route A & B.
riemann-zeta number-theory mathlib grh riemann-hypothesis analytic-number-theory littlewood lean4 riemann-zeta-function formal-proof riemann-hypothesis-lean4-mathematics riemann-zeta-constant bost-connes x0-143 riemann-zeta- kronecker-theorem omega-result zero-repulsion
-
Updated
Jul 23, 2026 - Lean