POC

[jeromekelleher]

Not for merging

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.71%. Comparing base (4187575) to head (4c892d7).
⚠️ Report is 76 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3279      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.60%   89.71%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          28       29       +1     
  Lines       31895    32332     +437     
  Branches     5857     5925      +68     
==========================================
+ Hits        28579    29008     +429     
- Misses       1886     1888       +2     
- Partials     1430     1436       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
c-tests	86.66% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
lwt-tests	80.38% <ø> (ø)
python-c-tests	88.18% <ø> (ø)
python-tests	98.80% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
python-tests-no-jit	32.94% <ø> (?)
python-tests-numpy1	50.56% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
c/tskit/trees.c	90.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[benjeffery]

Post 1.0 are we ok with the ABI break this makes? I think so as we state in the docs:

"We do not currently make any guarantees about ABI stability, since the primary use-case is for tskit to be embedded within another application rather than used as a shared library. If you do intend to use tskit as a shared library and ABI stability is therefore important to you, please let us know and we can plan accordingly."

[jeromekelleher]

I agree - strong API guarantees are enough, and we just highlight clearly that this is an ABI breaking release.