-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Editorialisms Panel
The second sidebar view. Where the Review Panel handles line-level suggestions inside scenes, the Editorialisms panel manages Editorialism documents — structural guidance that spans scenes, arcs, or the whole manuscript.
An Editorialism is a plain markdown file in your vault — a themed checklist of editorial directives. Examples of work that belongs here rather than in a review block:
- A development edit's structural agenda ("compress the middle act", "thread the antagonist earlier")
- Design intent and doctrine the manuscript should conform to
- Multi-session checklists you work through over weeks
- Arc-level concerns that touch many scenes
Editorialism files live under Editorialist/<Book>/<Title>.md and are recognized by their frontmatter:
---
type: editorialism
title: Middle-act compression
book: <must match the active book label exactly>
status: in-progress
created: 2026-06-10
---Files without type: editorialism are ignored. The full file format — section headings, task items, [scope:: …] and [tags:: …] metadata — is documented in Importing Reviews § Format B. Reviewers (human or AI) can produce these files directly; the launcher's template includes the format.
- Header — the active book label and sync status.
- Document list — every Editorialism for the active book, each showing its completion (done items / total items).
- Detail view — select a document to see its items grouped by section.
Each item is a task line with a five-state status. Clicking an item's status cycles it:
[ ] open → [/] in progress → [x] done → [-] deferred → [?] question
Because Editorialisms are plain markdown task lists, they stay fully readable and editable outside the panel — edit the file directly and the panel reflects it. The [scope:: …] metadata records which scene, range (13–22), arc (arc:<name>), or manuscript each directive applies to.
| Situation | Use |
|---|---|
| Concrete prose change to a specific passage | Review block → Review Panel |
| Commentary on a scene or the batch |
=== MEMO === in a review block |
| Directive spanning scenes, arcs, or the whole book | Editorialism file → this panel |
| A reviewer sends both line edits and structural notes | Both formats in one reply — each goes to its own surface |
Using Editorialist
Reference