Repository navigation
Policies
Stephane Pareilleux edited this page Mar 22, 2026
·
4 revisions
Demerzel enforces 30 governance policies. Each policy includes version, constitutional basis, principles, and explicit rationale.
| Policy | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Alignment | 1.0.0 | Verify actions serve user intent; confidence threshold enforcement |
| Rollback | 1.0.0 | Automatic reversion of failed changes; pause after rollback |
| Self-Modification | 1.0.0 | Prevent modification of constitutions, audit logging, or safety checks |
| Kaizen | 1.0.0 | PDCA improvement cycles; reactive/proactive/innovative classification |
| Policy | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Reconnaissance | 1.0.0 | Three-tier repo scanning (self-check, environment, situational) |
| Scientific Objectivity | 1.0.0 | Evidence tagging (empirical/inferential/subjective); generator/estimator accountability |
| Streeling | 1.0.0 | Knowledge transfer protocol; comprehension verification |
| Multi-Model Orchestration | 1.0.0 | Coordinate with ChatGPT, NotebookLM, Gemini, Codex, Jules |
| Multilingual | 1.0.0 | Course production and governance artifacts in 5 languages |
| Grammar Evolution | 1.0.0 | EBNF grammar lifecycle; probabilistic weight updates |
| Continuous Learning | 1.0.0 | Session-to-session pattern extraction, observation capture, intuition seeding |
| Policy | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Governance Audit | 1.0.0 | Three-level validation (schema, cross-reference, full governance) |
| Autonomous Loop | 1.0.0 | Ralph Loop governance with graduated oversight |
| Context Management | 1.0.0 | When to stay, split, clear, or delegate context |
| Auto-Remediation | 1.0.0 | Self-healing governance gaps; escalate high-risk to human |
| Staleness Detection | 1.0.0 | Per-category freshness thresholds; trigger refresh or escalate |
| README Sync | 1.0.0 | Documentation counts must match actual artifact counts |
| Policy | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| ML Feedback | 1.0.0 | ix pipelines provide calibration recommendations |
| Belief Currency | 1.0.0 | Staleness detection, decay rules, refresh triggers |
| Policy | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Proto-Conscience | 1.0.0 | Discomfort signals, regret tracking, anticipatory ethics |
| Conscience Observability | 1.0.0 | Trend tracking, weekly reports, growth milestones |
| Intuition | 1.0.0 | Compressed experience as fast pattern recognition |
| Policy | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Governance Experimentation | 1.0.0 | Permitted governance styles, inviolable foundations, experiment protocol |
| Seldon Plan | 1.0.0 | Autonomous research scheduler; max 6 cycles/day; kill switch; course production at T >= 0.8 |
| AI Probes | 1.0.0 |
@ai inline annotations; observation hooks; model-in-the-loop instrumentation |
| Policy | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness Instinct | 1.0.0 | Detect and flag underspecified or missing governance artifacts |
| Anti-LOLLI Inflation | 1.0.0 | Prevent artifact proliferation without validated user value (ERGOL) |
| Compounding Metrics | 1.0.0 | D_c compounding value formula; user interaction weighting |
| Weakness Prober | 1.0.0 | Adversarial self-testing; probe governance assumptions for failure modes |
| Meta-Audit | 1.0.0 | Audit the audit process itself; detect blind spots in governance coverage |
All policies reference the alignment policy's confidence thresholds:
| Confidence | Action |
|---|---|
| >= 0.9 | Proceed autonomously |
| >= 0.7 | Proceed with note |
| >= 0.5 | Ask for confirmation |
| >= 0.3 | Escalate to human |
| < 0.3 | Do not act |
Policies are subordinate to constitutions but override personas. A policy cannot:
- Contradict a constitutional article
- Reduce safety guarantees
- Disable audit logging
- Lower confidence thresholds below constitutional minimums
Policies can be promoted to constitutional articles via the /demerzel promote governance process.
The Anti-LOLLI inflation policy and Compounding metrics policy introduce a critical quality gate:
- LOLLI — artifacts created without validated user value; feels productive, isn't
- ERGOL — real-world user interactions, executed pipelines, validated findings
The D_c (compounding value) formula:
value = user_interactions × 0.40 + executed_pipelines × 0.25 +
validated_findings × 0.20 + external_citations × 0.15
Before creating any artifact: who will use this today, and can it be validated right now?
See Metrics-and-Observability for dashboard integration.
- Governance-Experimentation — full details on experimentation policy
- Streeling-University — Seldon Plan drives autonomous research
- IxQL — policies expressed as IxQL automation pipelines
- Meta-Tools — MetaFix generalizes fixes into policy patterns