Skip to content

Conversation

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Apr 18, 2025

#399426 may not land just now as there are still a couple of packages that are not building, however it's probably a good idea to land those who build without waiting

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` labels Apr 18, 2025
@aduh95 aduh95 mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2025
13 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Apr 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I decided to go straight to 22.x because there's nothing in this script that's not using very stable Node.js features, I suspect nodejs_18 was picked because it was the LTS at the time of aa4cf23, so to lower maintenance burden when nodejs_20 gets retired, let's make it target latest LTS instead.

@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the nodejs-18-so-long branch 2 times, most recently from 5684e90 to c0f2190 Compare April 18, 2025 14:03
@aduh95 aduh95 changed the title upgrade dependents to nodejs_20 in prevision for nodejs_18 EOL upgrade nodejs_18 dependents in prevision for upcoming EOL Apr 18, 2025
@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the nodejs-18-so-long branch from c0f2190 to be078b1 Compare April 18, 2025 14:14
@ppom0
Copy link
Contributor

ppom0 commented Apr 18, 2025

I didn't check if slskd is already compatible with Node.js v20, but opened the discussion upstream.

@TomaSajt TomaSajt mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2025
13 tasks
Copy link
Member

@Ma27 Ma27 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for wiki-js & meshcentral.

@Ma27
Copy link
Member

Ma27 commented Apr 20, 2025

btw, breaking changes for 25.05 won't be allowed anymore after April 23.
cc @NixOS/nixos-release-managers

@wegank wegank added 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels Apr 20, 2025
@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the nodejs-18-so-long branch from be078b1 to dc8397c Compare April 21, 2025 17:56
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. and removed 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 This PR causes between 11 and 100 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Apr 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@NyCodeGHG NyCodeGHG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for db-rest

Copy link
Contributor

@TomaSajt TomaSajt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for redisinsight

I've also opened #399823 for it

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Apr 21, 2025

@TomaSajt I've removed redisinsight from this PR to not conflict with your PR

@TomaSajt
Copy link
Contributor

Ah I see, I didn't re-check it after your force push.

In case the deadline arrives before it is merged you can add it back.

Copy link
Contributor

@florian-sanders-cc florian-sanders-cc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for clever-tools

Thanks for handling this 😉

@wegank wegank added 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more persons. and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels Apr 22, 2025
@Conni2461
Copy link
Member

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 399749


x86_64-linux

⏩ 2 packages blacklisted:
  • nixos-install-tools
  • tests.nixos-functions.nixos-test
✅ 9 packages built:
  • base16-builder
  • clever-tools
  • db-rest
  • meshcentral
  • onlykey
  • peertube
  • peertube.cli
  • peertube.runner
  • slskd

@0x4A6F 0x4A6F merged commit d8bfbd3 into NixOS:master Apr 22, 2025
24 checks passed
@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the nodejs-18-so-long branch April 22, 2025 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more persons. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants