number shift

there may have been a philosophical and linguistical dispute of how to count, starting from zero or starting from one.
this problem arises when the learning the alphabet the days of the week, month and year and mathematics.

𓈒𓏸𓆇𓇳 solo 🌤 0 vs 1 🌘mono, 🌕single, 🌒lonely: being one vs having no-one

this may or may not have resulted in cross identification of adjacent numbers:

If not a number shift, we can often identify a pairing between adjacent numbers (close levensthein distance)
which can often be explained by x+1 x-1 --x micro semantics:

1. minute (mono = 1)
2. second

versus

1. hour ( erst = 1 )
2. minute ( min = 2)

0	based	synthesis	based	1
0	zero	eyen 00	Ein,ek	1
0	none	mono	one	1
1	ein	?	shin	2
1	erst	𒄑 iṣu	Baum	2
2	ni	ニ	tree	3
2	teen		dreen	3
3	dritter		tetra	4
4	quat		quint	5
5	𓇼	pent liu	六｜6
6	sita		siete	7
7	siba	٧٨色巴	ba 八	8
8	basmony	восьмой	mneun	9
8	ach'many		mneun	9
9	𒅔	nin,in,9+1,shin	𒅔,𒊺 ŠE	10
9	diz'a	10-1	diz	10

The whole chinese system might be shifted if one just looks at correspondences
yi ⇨ 0
er ⇨ 1 erst
san ⇨ 2 teen
si ⇨ 3 sri
wu ⇨ 4 four
liu ⇨ 5 𓇼 ⋍ 六
qi ⇨ 6 qix
ba ⇨ 7 qiba (reunion)