semitic
The Semitic custom of treating all names with 'Ja' as semitic seems like a cheap trick.
It's like saying that He=God therefore Heracles must mean 'God' + r-c-l (whatever word you find: God-recalls ...). This custom is very unsatisfying (and in most cases likely wrong). Names should not be used to identify the ethnics of Kings.
๐ ๐ฟ ๐ ฑ ๐ ๐ช vi.air.on > Hiero = Old < gero
Erde โ ard@Semitic ๐ฐ๐น๐๐ธ๐ฐ airรพa ๐ฏ๐ garden E'den ๐ท๐๐๐ฏ
Germanic and Semitic words are surprisingly similar. Maybe a loanword?
Problem being, as you trace the origins of the words back through their known etymologies, they become more different instead of similar.
This may be true for some winded branches of the language word tree, however the general picture is (or should be) that semitic have too much vocabulary and structural overlap to be merely a contact phenomenon:
ูููู ูุง ู ุญู ุฏุ Quฤ faica ya Mohamed How do you do Mohamed?
The list of corresponding words is significant
https://github.com/pannous/hieros/blob/master/dicts/swadesh/SEMITIC.tsv
Home | Alphabet | Grammar | Gardiner-signs
Home
preserved words
PIE
Inventions
Kur
Signs
Keyboard
Dictionary
Swadesh lists
Text Corpus
Axioms
Grammar
Pronouns
Numbers
Highlights
Cosmos
Gothic
Akkadian
determinatives
+
รคะฏ | ๐ฟ |
---|---|
A | ๐ |
b | ๐ |
c | ๐ฟ |
D | ๐ |
ฮด | ๐ง |
E | ๐ |
F | ๐๐ |
G | ๐ผ๐ |
h | ๐ |
I | ๐ |
J | ๐ |
K | ๐ก๐จ๐ |
L | ๐ฏ๐ญ |
M | ๐ |
N | ๐ |
ฯฑ | ๐ข๐ฏ |
P | ๐ช |
Q | ๐ |
R | ๐ |
S | ๐ด |
T | ๐ ๐ |
แนณ | ๐ ฑ๐ข |
V | ๐ |
W | ๐ ณ |
X | ๐ |
Y | ๐ญ |
Z | ๐ ๐ |
SH | ๐ |