Skip to content

Qualify ShutdownCallbackHandle in context.cpp#3208

Open
Tobias-Fischer wants to merge 1 commit into
ros2:rollingfrom
Tobias-Fischer:codex/robostack-rclcpp-shutdown-callback-msvc
Open

Qualify ShutdownCallbackHandle in context.cpp#3208
Tobias-Fischer wants to merge 1 commit into
ros2:rollingfrom
Tobias-Fischer:codex/robostack-rclcpp-shutdown-callback-msvc

Conversation

@Tobias-Fischer

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is part of an effort to contribute RoboStack downstream patches back upstream.

This upstreams patch/ros-rolling-rclcpp.win.patch, authored in RoboStack by wep21 <daisuke.nishimatsu1021@gmail.com>.

Qualifying ShutdownCallbackHandle through the rclcpp namespace avoids dependent-name lookup issues on stricter C++ compilers while keeping the existing callback behavior unchanged.

This upstreams a RoboStack build fix from patch/ros-rolling-rclcpp.win.patch.

Qualifying ShutdownCallbackHandle through the rclcpp namespace avoids dependent-name lookup issues on stricter C++ compilers while keeping the existing callback behavior unchanged.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Fischer <info@tobiasfischer.info>
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Jul 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

  • Queue this pull request

@Tobias-Fischer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

FYI @wep21 @traversaro, this is a small PR from the effort to upstream RoboStack downstream patches tracked in RoboStack/robostack.github.io#16.

@ahcorde

ahcorde commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pulls: #3208
Gist: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ahcorde/9eea80c322b17212c996e7260aa81db2/raw/fa1c1f1fd811ca24bb418b9b9dda2ec1136d48ce/ros2.repos
BUILD args: --packages-above-and-dependencies rclcpp
TEST args: --packages-above rclcpp
ROS Distro: rolling
Job: ci_launcher
ci_launcher ran: https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_launcher/19904

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Linux-rhel Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants