Skip to content

Rollup of 12 pull requests#159095

Open
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 29 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-iZQZCKe
Open

Rollup of 12 pull requests#159095
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 29 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:rollup-iZQZCKe

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Successful merges:

r? @ghost

Create a similar rollup

joboet and others added 29 commits June 21, 2026 19:15
Signed-off-by: Amirhossein Akhlaghpour <m9.akhlaghpoor@gmail.com>
For small repr(C) aggregates with padding, direct constant
initialization can still lower into field-wise construction plus
memcpy. That leaves the backend to rediscover that the whole object
is a single constant byte pattern.

This is especially visible for non-zero constant aggregates. Instead
of materializing them as separate field stores, we want codegen_ssa to
emit the packed value directly. For example, a value like

    InnerPadded { a: 0, b: 1, c: 0 }

can otherwise lower to something like

    store i16 0, ptr %val, align 4
    store i8 1, ptr %val_plus_2, align 2
    store i32 0, ptr %val_plus_4, align 4
    call void @llvm.memcpy(..., ptr %val, ...)

while this change produces

    store i64 65536, ptr %val, align 4
    call void @llvm.memcpy(..., ptr %val, ...)

Why not solve this in LLVM?

At the problematic lowering point, rustc still knows that the MIR
aggregate is small and fully constant. LLVM only sees a lowered stack
temporary built from per-field stores and then copied out. Recovering
that packed constant there would require rediscovering front-end
aggregate semantics after lowering, so emitting the packed store in
rustc is the simpler and more local fix.

Why not keep the previous typed-copy approach?

An earlier approach zeroed padding on typed copies whose source could
be traced back to a constant assignment. That helped some cases, but it
also widened the optimization to runtime copy paths and could introduce
extra runtime stores purely to maintain padding knowledge. That is not
an acceptable tradeoff here.

Keep the scope narrow instead: only handle direct MIR aggregates whose
fields are all constants, and pack them according to the target
endianness before emitting a single integer store.

Add a focused codegen test covering the original PR 157690 entry
points together with non-zero constant cases. The test uses
-Cno-prepopulate-passes so it checks the immediate-store shape directly
at rustc codegen time, instead of depending on later LLVM store
merging.
Since PR 154149, when one item is glob-imported into a module twice with
different visibilities, the first-arrived declaration stays in the
resolution slot and the most visible declaration of the ambiguous glob
set is only recorded in `ambiguity_vis_max`. `DeclData::vis()` returns
the max, so name resolution, metadata reexports and
`cross_crate_inlinable` export the item at the maximum visibility, but
`set_bindings_effective_visibilities` walked only the slot-resident
declaration's reexport chain. When the restricted route arrives first,
the definition's effective visibility caps at the restricted
visibility while the item is still exported: spurious dead_code, the
item missing from reachable_set, should_encode_mir returning false, and
downstream crates failing with "missing optimized MIR" (a 1.96.1 ->
1.97.0 stable-to-stable regression).

Generalize the one-level `ambiguity_vis_max` update that PR 154149 added
in `update_import` (to keep the most visible import from being reported
as unused) into a walk of that declaration's whole reexport chain:
extract the chain walk into `update_decl_chain` and recurse into
`ambiguity_vis_max` at every hop, so the most visible declaration
drives the effective visibility of everything on its route, including
the final definition. Updates are monotone, so the dual walk is
order-independent. The `ambiguous_import_visibilities` lint and the
PR 156284 diagnostic suppression are untouched.
… `error_helper.rs` into the `diagnostics` folder in `rustc_resolve`
…alfJung

codegen_ssa: pack small const aggregates into immediate stores

Close rust-lang#157373

For small repr(C) aggregates with padding, direct constant
initialization can still lower into field-wise construction plus
memcpy. That leaves the backend to rediscover that the whole object
is a single constant byte pattern.

This is especially visible for non-zero constant aggregates. Instead
of materializing them as separate field stores, we want codegen_ssa to
emit the packed value directly. For example, a value like

    InnerPadded { a: 0, b: 1, c: 0 }

can otherwise lower to something like

    store i16 0, ptr %val, align 4
    store i8 1, ptr %val_plus_2, align 2
    store i32 0, ptr %val_plus_4, align 4
    call void @llvm.memcpy(..., ptr %val, ...)

while this change produces

    store i64 65536, ptr %val, align 4
    call void @llvm.memcpy(..., ptr %val, ...)

Why not solve this in LLVM?

At the problematic lowering point, rustc still knows that the MIR
aggregate is small and fully constant. LLVM only sees a lowered stack
temporary built from per-field stores and then copied out. Recovering
that packed constant there would require rediscovering front-end
aggregate semantics after lowering, so emitting the packed store in
rustc is the simpler and more local fix.

Why not keep the previous typed-copy approach?

An earlier approach zeroed padding on typed copies whose source could
be traced back to a constant assignment. That helped some cases, but it
also widened the optimization to runtime copy paths and could introduce
extra runtime stores purely to maintain padding knowledge. That is not
an acceptable tradeoff here.

Keep the scope narrow instead: only handle direct MIR aggregates whose
fields are all constants, and pack them according to the target
endianness before emitting a single integer store.
Use `as_lang_item` instead of repeatedly matching

drive-by fix I noticed while reviewing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157489/changes#r3550851573
…ochenkov

Move NativeLib::filename to the rmeta-link archive member

Second PR in rust-lang#138243
Moves `NativeLib::filename` out of `rmeta` into `lib.rmeta-link` archive member that was introduced in the first PR. Filename is a link time only data so requiring a full metadata decode should be avoided.  It is stored as `(name, filename)` pairs keyed by name, the new `MetadataLoader::get_rlib_native_lib_filenames` patches it back on decode.  Also bumped `METADATA_VERSION` from version 10 to 11. Added also new round trip test and existing bundled-libs tests still pass.
allow `Allocator`s to be used as `#[global_allocator]`s

The (hopefully) immanent stabilisation of the `Allocator` trait raises the question of what is to be done about the older, already-stable `GlobalAlloc` trait. In my opinion, having two nearly-identical traits for the same purpose is needlessly confusing. Going forward, `Allocator` as the more modern interface should be _the_ allocator trait.

With `Allocator` being currently unstable, there is the possibility of implementing `GlobalAlloc` for all `Allocator`s, thereby allowing them to be used as `#[global_allocator]` and allowing crates to seamlessly (and semver-compatibly) switch to `Allocator`. However, unconditionally implementing `GlobalAlloc` presents a footgun to users, as e.g. using `Global` as `#[global_allocator]` will lead to infinite recursion. @nia-e initially tried to resolve this in e1b7097 (rust-lang#156882) by using weird trait trickery to implement `GlobalAlloc` for every allocator except `Global`. But this does not go far enough, e.g. a bump allocator that itself allocates from `Global` is similarly unsuitable as global allocator.

Thus, with this PR, I'd like to propose adding a new marker trait for allocators that can be used as `#[global_allocator]`:
```rust
// in core::alloc

trait GlobalAllocator: Allocator {}
```
`GlobalAlloc` can then be implemented for all `GlobalAllocator`s:
```rust
impl<A> GlobalAlloc for A
where
    A: GlobalAllocator
{
    /* ... */
}
```

This provides a backwards-compatible way for allocator libraries to switch to the new interface and allows deprecating `GlobalAlloc` (not done here). Over time, I expect that `GlobalAlloc` will become more and more of an implementation detail of the `#[global_allocator]` macro (for instance, one might add perma-unstable, hidden methods for things like `grow_zeroed` that are customised only by the blanket implementation).

With regards to naming, I chose `GlobalAllocator` to mirror `Allocator`. `GlobalAlloc` should probably be deprecated quickly after stabilising `GlobalAllocator` to avoid confusion. For the same reason, I think it'd be better to add `GlobalAllocator` before stabilising `Allocator` – but that is not a necessity.

r? @nia-e
@rustbot label +I-libs-api-nominated
merge DefKind::InlineConst into AnonConst

This is a closely related followup to rust-lang#158375 (a condition of merging that PR was doing this as a followup)

This merge conflicts with rust-lang#158617 ; prefer merging that one first please~

This PR is within the general goal of const generics / `generic_const_args` and perhaps specifically rust-lang/project-const-generics#108 but is mostly a code cleanup rather than implementing any particular feature

---

Anon consts (the `1 + 2` in `let x: [u8; 1 + 2];`) are closely related to inline consts (the `const {}` in `let x = const { 1 + 2 };`). They are especially related now that both can be used in the type system (by the above PR) and should be treated identically in that scenario. In general, they should be treated the same, as evidenced by the number of matches touched in this PR that just match on both. This PR merges the two DefKinds into one, mostly arbitrarily and bikesheddily choosing to use the name `AnonConst` for the merged concept (e.g. both `DefKind::InlineConst` and `DefKind::AnonConst` used `ast::AnonConst`, so `ast::AnonConst` should probably be named whatever the merged `DefKind` concept is named).

When you absolute must distinguish between the two, `tcx.anon_const_kind` allows you to do so - however, anon consts/inline consts in the type system intentionally appear identically under `anon_const_kind`. Indeed, the places where we distinguish between the two raised my eyebrows a few times when doing this PR, and being a little more explicit and loud about it is helpful for code clarity, IMO.

r? @BoxyUwU
…biguity, r=petrochenkov

resolve: fix effective visibilities for items in ambiguous glob sets

Fixes rust-lang#159038 (1.96.1 → 1.97.0 regression; details there).

When an item is glob-imported twice at different visibilities, effective visibility was computed from whichever declaration arrived first, not the most visible one. An exported item could then get no MIR encoded, and downstream crates fail with ``missing optimized MIR``.

Fix: also walk the most visible declaration's re-export chain (`update_decl_chain`, recursing into `ambiguity_vis_max`). Lint behavior unchanged. Two regression tests added; `tests/ui/{imports,privacy,resolve}` pass with every rust-lang#154149 / rust-lang#156284 test unmodified.

@rustbot label +A-resolve +A-visibility +T-compiler +regression-from-stable-to-stable
… r=JonathanBrouwer

Apply MCP 1003 and move diagnostics.rs into its own module

Fixes rust-lang#158699.

r? @JonathanBrouwer
…s-ok-unwrap, r=nnethercote

Add codegen test for Result is_ok unwrap

Closes rust-lang#85771
…yuVanilla

assert only opaques with sub unified hidden infer are non-rigid

Fixes rust-lang#158784

r? lcnr
…anilla

Remove unused WEAK_ONLY_LANG_ITEMS static
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Jul 10, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Jul 10, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

Trying commonly failed jobs
@bors try jobs=dist-various-1,test-various,x86_64-gnu-aux,x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-3,x86_64-msvc-1,aarch64-apple,x86_64-mingw-1,i686-msvc-*

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 0db2cc0 has been approved by JonathanBrouwer

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 10, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⌛ Trying commit 0db2cc0 with merge 5c57dda

To cancel the try build, run the command @bors try cancel.

Workflow: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/29104604279

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2026
Rollup of 12 pull requests


try-job: dist-various-1
try-job: test-various
try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
try-job: x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-3
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: i686-msvc-*
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 0db2cc0 with merge cab5cd2...

Workflow: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/29115859212

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2026
…uwer

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #157690 (codegen_ssa: pack small const aggregates into immediate stores)
 - #159005 (Use `as_lang_item` instead of repeatedly matching)
 - #156735 (Move NativeLib::filename to the rmeta-link archive member)
 - #157153 (allow `Allocator`s to be used as `#[global_allocator]`s)
 - #158767 (merge DefKind::InlineConst into AnonConst)
 - #159039 (resolve: fix effective visibilities for items in ambiguous glob sets)
 - #158732 (Apply MCP 1003 and move diagnostics.rs into its own module)
 - #158930 (Reorganize `tests/ui/issues` [20/N])
 - #158965 (Add codegen test for Result is_ok unwrap)
 - #158979 (Reorganize `tests/ui/issues` [21/N])
 - #159050 (assert only opaques with sub unified hidden infer are non-rigid)
 - #159062 (Remove unused WEAK_ONLY_LANG_ITEMS static)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.