Skip to content

Resolve conflicts from branch admin page#346

Merged
adamziel merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
codex/wp-admin-conflict-actions
May 18, 2026
Merged

Resolve conflicts from branch admin page#346
adamziel merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
codex/wp-admin-conflict-actions

Conversation

@adamziel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What it does

Adds conflict review and resolution controls to the full wp-admin ForkPress branch manager conflict drilldown. Conflict rows can now mark review state, use source, keep target, or apply a reviewed choice when the audit payload says that action is available.

Rationale

The branch manager could show history, branch tree, and conflict rows, but actual conflict action buttons still lived mostly in the branch switcher. This makes the larger admin page a usable conflict review surface.

Implementation

  • Reuses the existing forkpress_branch_review_conflict and forkpress_branch_resolve_conflict JSON actions.
  • Gates source/target choices with the conflict record resolution_choices and blocked_resolution_choices contract.
  • Shows Apply reviewed only for validated/apply-reviewed queue records.
  • Refreshes the conflict queue after review or resolution actions.

Testing instructions

php -l wp-plugin/forkpress-wp.php
php -l tests/cow/branch_ui.php
php tests/cow/branch_ui.php

@adamziel adamziel merged commit 8046ed2 into trunk May 18, 2026
13 checks passed
@adamziel adamziel deleted the codex/wp-admin-conflict-actions branch May 18, 2026 14:46
@adamziel adamziel mentioned this pull request May 18, 2026
adamziel added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2026
## Release `v0.1.35`

Version bump and release metadata update for `v0.1.35`.

**Changelog draft:**
* Extend merge revalidation and WordPress semantic guards
([#313](#313))
* Add Events Calendar-shaped merge smoke coverage
([#318](#318))
* Extend semantic E2E with Site Editor objects
([#317](#317))
* Add thin SSH remote clone command
([#315](#315))
* Update release gate evidence for v0.1.34
([#319](#319))
* Guard plugin children behind logical identity collisions
([#320](#320))
* Hold case-insensitive upload path collisions
([#322](#322))
* Cover scoped crash recovery
([#323](#323))
* Hold malformed attachment metadata shapes
([#324](#324))
* Cover thin remote clone branch metadata
([#326](#326))
* Cover source-added trigger view dependencies
([#321](#321))
* Cover WooCommerce duplicate address semantics
([#325](#325))
* Cover Events Calendar organizer validator semantics
([#327](#327))
* Cover Elementor widget media validator semantics
([#328](#328))
* Reject duplicate attachment upload metadata rows
([#329](#329))
* Cover existing branch Git update crash recovery
([#330](#330))
* Mark WordPress media repairs review-only
([#331](#331))
* Cover backup attachment metadata drift
([#332](#332))
* Limit release verification for COW-only PRs
([#335](#335))
* Batch merge reliability roadmap coverage
([#336](#336))
* Cover WordPress upload MIME drift
([#333](#333))
* Add branch merge history commands
([#334](#334))
* Show restored stale-audit reviews
([#337](#337))
* Cover Yoast duplicate indexable permalinks
([#338](#338))
* Cover Yoast indexable hierarchy drift
([#339](#339))
* Cover revision parent semantic drift
([#340](#340))
* Expose merge history in branch switcher
([#341](#341))
* Cover ACF relationship validator drift
([#342](#342))
* Show merge history on branch admin page
([#343](#343))
* Drill into conflicts from branch admin history
([#344](#344))
* Expose branch tree on admin page
([#345](#345))
* Resolve conflicts from branch admin page
([#346](#346))
* Document conflict review workflow
([#347](#347))

**Full changelog:**
v0.1.34...release/v0.1.35

## Next steps

1. **Review** the changes in this pull request.
2. **Push** any additional edits to this branch (`release/v0.1.35`).
3. **Merge** this pull request to publish `v0.1.35`.

Merging will automatically build ForkPress binaries, create a GitHub
release, and update the Homebrew formula.

Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants