Review of Guideline #20

Review of Guideline #20

Formatting

Item	Outcome
Guideline complies with the Guideline-Template	Yes
Name of guideline responsible with affiliation is clearly stated	Yes

Is the audience of the guideline correctly specified?

Yes

Is the expertise required to write the guideline correctly specified?

No ... currently TBD

Are the keywords well selected?

Yes

Are parts of the guideline too generic or too specific?

The guideline is maybe too specific ... wouldn't it improve by instead "just" pointing out the possibility of using an external clock for ILA, and then mention the specific problem as a hint?

Does the guideline explicitly refer to the handbook? To which part of the deliverable is it relevant (e.g., chapter of D1.2/D1.3)?

No

Does the guideline specify the work done in the project that can benefit from the guideline?

Well, it is generic in the sense that it deals with debugging, so it applies "all" debugging work

Other comments

1. Guideline advice:

2. Insights that led to the guideline:

3. Recommended implementation method of the guideline along with a solid motivation for the recommendation:

4. Instantiation of the recommended implementation method in the reference platform:

5. Evaluation of the guideline in reference applications:

6. References:

Track changes:

1. 30/07/2018: Made some formatting changes in the guidelines to cope with template.
2. 23/11/2018: guideline reviewed.
3. 29/01/2019: guildeine updated