Review of Guideline #36

Review of Guideline #36

Formatting

Item	Outcome
Guideline complies with the Guideline-Template	Yes
Name of guideline responsible with affiliation is clearly stated	Yes

Is the audience of the guideline correctly specified?

I would also add system architects and HW designers as the tools are for FPGA and this guideline also true for HW.

Is the expertise required to write the guideline correctly specified?

Same as for audience

Are the keywords well selected?

No I would say risk reduction during development or similar

Are parts of the guideline too generic or too specific?

No, it is at the right level

Does the guideline explicitly refer to the handbook? To which part of the deliverable is it relevant (e.g., chapter of D1.2/D1.3)?

No.

Does the guideline specify the work done in the project that can benefit from the guideline?

Yes.

Other comments

1. Guideline advice:

2. Insights that led to the guideline:

3. Recommended implementation method of the guideline along with a solid motivation for the recommendation:

4. Instantiation of the recommended implementation method in the reference platform:

5. Evaluation of the guideline in reference applications:

6. References:

Track changes:

1. 02/08/2018: Guideline created
2. 25/01/2019: guideline reviewed.
3. 30/01/2019: guideline updated