Skip to content

WORKED_CASES

TheDaniel166 edited this page Oct 22, 2026 · 1 revision

Worked-case catalogue

Status: figure/heading inventory checked against the original scan; numerical reconstruction and complete judgement/outcome collation pending. This is part of the Lilly core packet. Exact per-page image locators are in packet.json; the Wellcome manifest is the governing page map.

Counting contract

  • Book II: 35 distinct printed filled figures and 36 case groups when the separate office question at pp.456-457 is counted.
  • C31 uses C30's p.455 figure; Lilly describes the questions as four or five minutes apart. This is neither a new printed diagram nor an identical admitted numerical epoch.
  • C36 is a departure/inception figure, not automatically a propounded horary question. Excluding it leaves 35 other Book II groups; that is a corpus category count, not 35 proven independent consultations or predictions.
  • Book I adds one filled figure at p.35 and two textual erection exercises. Thus Books I-II contain 36 filled figures in this inventory, using a different denominator from the 36 Book II case groups.
  • The empty house template at p.33, unillustrated anecdotes, numerical definitions and hypothetical adaptations do not increase the historical worked-figure count.

The roster was built from original-page checks, OCR navigation and chapter navigation aids. All 35 distinct Book II diagram pages, p.456, and the three Book I exercises were visually inspected. This does not claim an exhaustive inventory of every unillustrated narrative or every topic-specific rule.

Book II roster

Titles are our normalized descriptions. Dates/clocks are literal readings in modern typography; they are not admitted civil timestamps. No calendar, year start, noon-clock conversion, locality, UT or JD has been inferred. An em dash means not established from the inspected heading/figure.

The topic column reports source context, not an automatically selected API house. Every row still needs full planetary/cusp transcription and complete judgement collation. The last column records additional distinctive blockers.

ID Normalized case Figure page Raw date; raw clock Source context and additional blocker
C01 Longevity, life direction, past and future circumstances 135 14 March 1632; 2:15 P.M. First house; multiple demands share a figure; year-start policy
C02 Mother asks whether son is at home or with his master 152 19 July 1638; 23h45 P.M. First-house section; son fifth, mother's home fourth, master tenth; noon clock and hypothetical reuse
C03 Merchant's ship: lost or surviving 162 28 December 1644; 3:20 P.M. First house, ship; observer and ship locations must remain distinct
C04 Another ship: condition and possible loss 165 9 March 1646; 10:15 A.M. First house, ship; OCR suggests 1645 incorrectly; year-start policy
C05 Tradesman's wealth, means, timing and continuance 177 16 July 1634; 11:00 A.M. Second house; several demands and a strength-table dependency
C06 Absent brother: life, whereabouts, news and return 196 Friday 7 November 1645; hora meridiana Third house; judgement begins p.197; printed noon requires time policy
C07 Report that Cambridge was captured 200 11 April 1643; 4:31 P.M. Third, reports; first Parliament/seventh opponents; separate hypothetical sibling adaptation
C08 Lilly's purchase of Master B.'s houses 219 31 March 1634; 6 P.M. Fourth, property; self-question; purchase, financing and descriptions are separate claims
C09 Whether querent will ever have children 238 11 June 1635; 2:30 P.M. Fifth; separate fertility judgement, descriptions and later natal-policy discussion
C10 Expected child's sex and delivery timing 240 7 April 1645; 2:15 P.M. Fifth; sex testimonies, timing and reported delivery need separate records
C11 Sick doctor: illness, affected parts and prognosis 286 8 May 1645; 6:15 P.M. Sixth; historical medical interpretation is doctrine, not clinical validation
C12 Sick person: disease and survival 289 16 July 1645; 7:22 A.M. Sixth; later crisis arithmetic supposes this epoch as disease onset
C13 Lady seeks marriage to previously rejected suitor 385 16 June 1646; 19:26 P.M. Seventh; noon clock, intervention advice and hypothetical extensions
C14 Woman asks about marrying desired man 389 11 June 1646; 10:38 A.M. Seventh; separate consultation from C13
C15 Fugitive servant: direction and return 390 —; — Seventh-house section, servant through sixth lord; judgement p.391; no readily stated epoch
C16 Missing dog: location and recovery 392 29 August 1646; 4:05 P.M. Seventh-house section; dog assigned sixth as small animal
C17 Missing money: thief and recovery 395 24 May 1647; 5 P.M. Seventh-house theft section; peregrine-planet selection is not simply seventh lord
C18 Lilly's stolen fish 397 Chart 10 February 1638; 8:45 A.M.; narrative year 1637 Theft; retain both years; possible chronology explanation remains unadmitted
C19 Waller versus Hopton near Alresford 399 29 March 1644; 10:12 A.M. Seventh, conflict; diagram p.399, continuation p.400
C20 Essex's siege of Reading 401 17 April 1643; 6:50 P.M. Seventh, siege; town fourth/king tenth; separate hypothetical lawsuit adaptation
C21 Whether husband or wife dies first 415 6 February 1644; 9:10 P.M. Eighth-house section, wife seventh; year-start and outcome-source review
C22 Woman asks about husband at sea 417 15 April 1645; 1:10 P.M. Eighth section, also ninth; source assigns quesited eleventh; preserve actual role reasoning
C23 Canterbury's manner of death 419 3 December 1644; 2:24 P.M. Eighth topic, churchman ninth; turning and retrospective political evidence
C24 Payment of promised marriage portion 421 15 July 1634; 6:15 P.M. Eighth, woman's substance; payment and descriptions differ
C25 Disturbing dreams 436 26 January 1643; 9:27 A.M. Ninth; year start; dream interpretation and reported financial circumstances differ
C26 Obtaining a parsonage 437 6 August 1644; 8:24 P.M. Ninth, ecclesiastical preferment; do not automatically recast as tenth
C27 Whether Presbytery will endure 439 11 March 1646/7; 4:45 P.M. Ninth, religious government; retain dual year and Lilly's conjectural qualification
C28 Attaining the philosopher's stone 442 27 May 1647; 10:45 A.M. Ninth, knowledge/art; existing fixture is assignment-only; subsequent attainment not established here
C29 Prince Rupert's honour, conflict with Essex and fate 452 28 November 1642; 9:23 A.M. Tenth section; Lilly acknowledges an interpretive error; do not erase it
C30 Irish aid for king; queen's advance and meeting 455 —; — Tenth king, fourth queen as seventh from tenth, eleventh aid; no readily printed epoch
C31 Gentleman's desired office Reuses 455 —; — Separate question, text pp.456-457; four/five-minute difference with unknown direction; no new diagram
C32 Lost or stolen horse near Henley 467 11 January 1646; 2:39 P.M. Twelfth, horse; year start; source acknowledges a timing discrepancy
C33 Whether patient is bewitched 468 13 March 1646; 8:05 A.M. Twelfth/sixth; year start; distinguish rejected witchcraft explanation from historical medical explanation
C34 Escaped prisoner: route and recapture 470 6 June 1647; 8 P.M. Twelfth; several status, location, news and recapture claims
C35 Lady's imprisoned husband: release 471 19 October 1645; 7:20 P.M. Twelfth topic, husband seventh; source says release occurred before question: no prospective-prediction label
C36 Essex's final departure westward 473 Monday 13 May 1644; 12:29 P.M. Inception/event; journey ninth, commander first; noon clock and chart-purpose classification

Only explicitly checked judgement starts/ranges are recorded in the index; blank ends do not mean that a judgement ends at the next diagram. The p.442 assignment fixture's known source span is pp.442-445. Full author-reported outcomes remain uncollated; C27/C29/C32/C35 preserve qualifications already noticed, rather than pretending a complete outcome audit has been performed.

Book I computational teaching examples

ID Location / figure Raw epoch Admission concern
E01 Filled figure p.35; discussion pp.34-39 Tuesday 6 January 1646; one hour thirty minutes P.M. P.39 explains that the first figure's planetary positions were not fully rectified to its hour. Printed-chart and modern-reconstruction expectations must differ.
E02 Text pp.39-40; no new figure Saturday 17 January 1646; eleven o'clock and twenty after noon House-erection arithmetic; preserve the noon-based statement before conversion.
E03 Text pp.41-42; no new figure Monday 26 January 1646; 9:45 before noon P.41 explicitly equates this with Sunday 25 January, 21h45 after noon. This is an independent historical-clock control.

These are computational examples, not outcome predictions. P.47's interpolation/local ephemeris instructions add another reason not to demand that every printed coordinate equal a modern precise reconstruction. A historical discrepancy must be explained and preserved, not tuned away by changing an astronomical calculation.

Numerical definitions and reused teaching material

Didactic numerical examples are separate from historical case groups:

ID Pages Definition/example to transcribe independently Initial fixture purpose
D01 110 Jupiter/Saturn application with nine-degree full orbs each Named orb choice, summed halves and complete separation
D02 110-111 Bodily and aspectual prohibition examples Role orientation, intended contact and third-party sequence
D03 111 Mars/Saturn intended conjunction interrupted by Mars reversal Refranation without requiring a later exact conjunction
D04 111 Mercury 16 Aries separating from Mars 15 and joining Saturn 20 Structural translation; p.126's fuller qualifications remain separate
D05 112 Mutual reception examples by dignity Host/guest direction and same/mixed basis; uncertain glyphs still need collation
D06 112-113 Mercury 10 Aries, Mars 12, Jupiter 13 Frustration's bodily conjunction scope
D07 113-114 Combustion, beams and cazimi examples Same-sign condition; apparent p.113 numeric inconsistency is not a golden
D08 121-122 Planetary-hour identity, triplicity and nature examples Preserve Lilly's distinct agreement paths

Additional teaching reuse, discovered but not exhaustively catalogued:

  • C02: pp.154-157 hypothetical relatives, strangers, sudden events and absent persons, plus bodily marks.
  • C07: p.201 hypothetical sibling application.
  • C12: pp.292-293 supposed disease-onset/crisis arithmetic.
  • C13: p.388 hypothetical longevity, wealth, agreement and character.
  • C20: pp.403-404 hypothetical litigation adaptation.
  • P.166: hypothetical visitor/letter-receipt examples about when to erect a question; not additional historical figures.
  • Practice anecdotes at pp.149-150, 213, 233 and 466 need a separate narrative register. This is a discovery list, not a complete narrative denominator.

The separate 1644 gentlewoman/aged-man fixture mentioned in earlier research does not belong to the 1647 Christian Astrology case lineage. Do not blend it into this denominator or promote it as a first-edition case without its own source record.

Fixture promotion contract

Each case must earn its own promotion; catalogue presence grants none of the following gates automatically:

  1. Printed-chart transcription: two independent entries of every used planet, degree/minute, sign, motion mark and cusp, with page/crop locators, uncertain readings and alternate-image resolution. Keep printed values.
  2. Historical input receipt: literal and normalized dates, calendar/year start/noon clock, timezone or local-time model, locality and coordinates, conversion derivation and uncertainty. Unknown time stays unknown. C31 needs its own offset receipt even though it shares a printed figure.
  3. Question/role receipt: literal question location, normalized proposition, entities, caller context, radical/turned derivation, each proposed significator and ambiguity. Chapter placement cannot replace the actual house assignment in the judgement.
  4. Doctrinal witness: passage-by-passage support and opposition, source rules, event order and conditions, qualitative judgement and any timing derivation. Mark hypothetical extensions and conjectures explicitly.
  5. Numerical reconstruction: a separate modern calculation with declared astronomical products, kernels, house policy, timescales and tolerances. Preserve disagreements with the printed chart and explain them; never edit the printed data to manufacture agreement.
  6. Outcome receipt: distinguish what Lilly reports, when it was known, independently dated corroboration and what remains unknown. C35 cannot demonstrate a prediction of release after the question. An author's retrospective report alone is not independent outcome verification.
  7. Test admission: source-owned expected results, reviewer provenance, positive/negative/boundary controls and explicit assertions about which evidence class the fixture validates. No implementation-output goldens.

Recommended first tranche: E01-E03 and D01-D08, then C28 for the existing role assignment lineage, C08 for a transaction and C13/C14 for marriage. Select a complete topic module only after its full rule chapter and worked judgement are collated. Numerical agreement, faithful historical interpretation and prospective predictive performance must remain separately measured.

Clone this wiki locally