Repository navigation
How decisions are made
The project lead is the safety authority and often reviews from a phone. The process keeps the questions put to them few, and each one quick to answer. The rules are in the decision register README; this page is the short version.
Rendered from register.yaml by infographics.py at every wiki sync; no number on it is typed by hand.
- Risk acceptance
- ASIL and hazard scope
- Vehicle behaviour defaults and ODD limits
- Money, hardware, the assessor
- Roles and independence
- Gate go or no-go
A reversible technical choice is made by the engineering side, recorded as assumed with the recommended option, and the lead can change it later. A task is not a decision: it stays in the work product that owns it.
When the register was seeded on 2026-10-14 from a sweep of every open item in assurance/, 676 rows were found.
433 were tasks and stayed in their documents. The rest were merged where several documents asked the same
question, and each entry's sources list them all.
Every entry in register.yaml stands on its own. No bare
IDs. A question carries:
- the question in plain words;
- two or three lines on what is at stake;
- two to four options, the recommendation first, each with what it does and costs;
- how hard it is to undo (
easy,revisit,hard), what it blocks, and which gate it belongs to; - the sources: every document that raised it;
- one picture when it shows the difference between the options.
stateDiagram-v2
direction LR
[*] --> queued : recorded
queued --> open : batch of ten opens
open --> answered : the lead picks an option
open --> assumed : no answer by the proceed-after date (easy to undo only)
answered --> applied : change made, commit named
assumed --> applied : change made, the lead can still change it
queued --> withdrawn : no longer applies
open --> withdrawn : no longer applies
applied --> [*]
withdrawn --> [*]
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
queued |
Recorded but not asked yet. May name questions to settle first. |
open |
Asked; in the current batch of about ten. |
answered |
The lead picked an option, on the inbox page or in chat. |
assumed |
No answer by the proceed-after date; the recommended option was taken. Allowed only when easy to undo. The lead can still change it. |
applied |
The change is made. The entry names the commit and where the decision is recorded. |
withdrawn |
The question no longer applies; a note says why. |
A hard question is never assumed and never applied without an answer from the lead. A revisit question
waits for an answer too, but can be reopened at the gate it names. Once applied, the decision is recorded
where the project keeps that kind of decision:
WP-M-07 §5 for strategic decisions, otherwise the work
product that owns the item. The register entry points there.
- Sort before asking. Only what the lead alone can decide reaches the register as a question.
- Batches of ten. About ten questions are open at a time, those that unblock the most. The rest wait as queued, written ahead so the next batch is ready.
-
Answer on the inbox page or in chat. The inbox page is generated from the register by
build_inbox.py; its answers are copied back into the register at the start of the next session. - Explanations first. Requests to explain a question are answered before anything new is asked.
- Apply and record. The change is made, the entry points to the commit, and the next ten open.
check_decisions.py checks the register against these
rules in the assurance workflow on every pull request.
Mirrored from wiki/ on liondriver-dev at 7a1aec4, 2026-11-04. Pages are reviewed by pull request; the wiki is not edited in place. This wiki explains and links; safety claims and evidence live in the assurance record.
LionDriver wiki
- Home
- Roadmap and status
- How LionDriver works
- How the repository is organized
- How decisions are made
- Glossary
- What is a safety case?
- Reading the Living Safety Case
- Standards at a glance
- From hazard to test
- Deriving and writing safety requirements
- ASIL decomposition
- Building a fault tree
- Hardware safety and interference
- After release (ISO 26262 Part 7)
- SOTIF and ISO 26262
- Cybersecurity and ISO/SAE 21434
- AI safety and ISO/PAS 8800
- ASPICE: is the process capable?
- Integrated standards: one system, not five
- For the assessor
- Reference vehicle
- CAN, CAN FD and end-to-end protection
- Contributor guide
- Reporting a safety concern
- Session log
- FAQ
Repository