Contributing and Corrections

Contributing and Corrections

Useful contribution types

• identify a source mismatch;
• recover a missing qualifier or relation;
• provide a counterexample;
• distinguish two mechanisms that were merged;
• show that two terms describe the same process;
• propose an operational definition or measurement;
• report a valid null;
• test portability without project vocabulary;
• improve navigation without changing claim status;
• document whether a correction propagated.

Correction template

Object:
Current representation:
Observed delta:
Evidence or source:
Why the delta matters:
Proposed repair:
Affected downstream pages:
What would change this assessment:

Contribution-state discipline

Separate:

• source contribution;
• exact wording;
• synthesis;
• criticism;
• candidate extension;
• administrative implementation;
• external validation.

Where to contribute

• GitHub issues
• Public Forum
• Contributing guide

Conduct

Strong criticism is welcome when it stays on the object and supplies a correction path. Personal praise or hostility does not replace evidential work. Humor is welcome when it returns to the object rather than becoming a way to escape it.