Repository navigation
Process Quality and Reciprocal Scrutiny
PQCE (Process Quality Calibration Evaluation) follows the quality of the processing between what arrived, its representation, evaluation, action, consequences and later correction. The source page's governing distinction is: PQCE is not what flawed flagging systems are doing.
A useful examination can preserve:
- the received source and actual access;
- the representation produced, including qualifiers and alternatives;
- the assumption and evidence carrying an evaluation;
- the decision, its available alternatives and who bears its consequences;
- clarification or correction and the response to it;
- the next comparable operation.
An approving response, warning, rewrite or refusal can each be examined through this sequence. Tone and agreement status leave the process question open. C1 Before C2 can clarify what is useful as well as what needs repair.
Asymmetric Grace diagnoses a possible unequal distribution of uncertainty, contextual explanation, scrutiny, correction access, error cost and memory. Symmetric Grace, mutual dignity and proportionate scrutiny name the valued direction.
Comparable access to faithful representation and correction can coexist with different evidential demands. Explain differences through evidence, power, imposition, opacity, reversibility, exposure and consequence. The institution, outsider, claimant, classifier and framework remain examinable.
Four useful questions are: whose uncertainty stayed open; who received clarification or appeal; who carried the error cost; and whose error became an enduring identity label?
DEDDA (Deep Ethical Drift Detector App) is a concept and configurable correspondence-witness design. It compares a supplied object with its later representation and returns a material difference, a valid null or an explicitly unresolved result. The person retains the next decision.
For a source/summary comparison, its Source–Summary Correspondence Lens, Qualifier Keeper and Provenance Compass have distinct jobs. Record which operations were active, the passages supporting the finding and what remains inaccessible. A correction-return comparison can then follow whether an accepted repair governs the rest of the response and later work.
The witness's own findings remain open to correction. A bounded finding belongs to its particular source, representation, access and time.
Continue with Provenance, Claim Status and Contribution and Longitudinal Correction and VCRAS.
Source and status: orientation to the linked public working pages, checked 30 October 2026. Instrument design, observed specimens and empirical validation remain distinguishable.
ACCM Deep Ethics Project Wiki · Orientation layer, not canonical authority · Public project · Source repository · Corrections
Early BETA · Draft · Trial and error · John has veto power over project drift. Reality has veto power over John.
Orientation
Working concept
- Deep Ethics as a Working Concept
- Architecture Map
- Ten Plus One
- Twenty-Seven Plus Twelve
- C1 Before C2
- Intelligence Properties and 1888
Methods and audits
- Correspondence, Corrigibility and Reality Veto
- Believism and Value–Usefulness
- Topologetics and Compression
- Methods, Evidence and Experiments
- Process Quality and Reciprocal Scrutiny
- Longitudinal Correction and VCRAS
- Controversy Inquiry and Source Recovery
- Provenance, Claim Status and Contribution
Local implementation research
Stewardship and use
- Governance and Correction
- Contributing and Corrections
- Sources and Recovery Routes
- Wiki Maintenance Map
- Glossary
Encyclopedic proposal