Sources and Recovery Routes

Sources and Recovery Routes

Source hierarchy by job

Need	Preferred route
Exact canonical wording	Canonical Files repository
Current developed public page	GitHub Pages site
Editable source and commit history	Main repository
Public change rationale	Decision Ledger
Page snapshots	Meta-PDFs
Experimental records	Experiments and Cold Tests
Orientation	This Wiki

Recovery rule

If a short Wiki statement appears ambiguous, follow its link to the fuller public page. If exact wording, ordering or authorship matters, continue to the repository source, canonical file or dated commit.

Citation rule

Prefer immutable commit links for historical claims. Use current public links for living pages when the current version is the intended object. State the access date for mutable external sources.

Missing access

Absence from a summary or evaluator’s accessible representation is not automatically absence in the source. State the access perimeter before drawing a completeness conclusion.

Process and case recovery

Need	Fuller source
Intelligence-property inquiry	1888
Process Quality Calibration Evaluation	Flagging System / PQCE
Correspondence-witness design	DEDDA
Reciprocal scrutiny and proportionality	Asymmetric Grace and Bidirectional Scrutiny
Competing assessments across time	VCRAS
Practical uncertainty and next moves	Healthy Ambiguity
Case archives and access layers	Controversy Inquiry and Source Recovery

Recover the Wiki separately

GitHub stores this Wiki in a separate Git repository: https://github.com/deepethics/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project.wiki.git. A main-repository file ZIP alone does not include it. For an exact backup, record both repository commit identifiers and preserve the Wiki files separately. A Git bundle can also preserve reachable history; a file snapshot serves the readable-copy job. Keep the archive's own scope and verification record with it.