TEST SUGGESTIONREVIEW 115 UI Case

TEST-SUGGESTIONREVIEW-115 - Verify TR-15: Category suggestion eligibility and review

Linked specification for the matching authoritative QBrain TEST record. Persistence is reported by receipt.json; this documentation run executed no application tests.

Field	Specification
Objective	Verify Verify TR-15: Category suggestion eligibility and review.
QBrain reference/scope	TEST-SUGGESTIONREVIEW-115; Word Pairs / PROD-WORDPAIRS; workspace <home>/github/WordGame/.mcpServer/wordpairs; layer layer-1
Source revision	Original designs at 435be05abac5310172cfb9a9290c9d7ea0d1cbde; exact dirty prose/decision hashes in sources.json. New UI-DEC decisions derive from the operator instruction to fill gaps.
Source links	word_association_category_suggestion.svg
Frame/element identifiers	SUG-FLOW, SUG-NODE-E, SUG-NODE-F, SUG-NODE-G, SUG-NODE-H, SUG-NODE-I, SUG-TRANS-D-E, SUG-TRANS-E-F, SUG-TRANS-F-G, SUG-TRANS-F-H, SUG-TRANS-H-I, SCREEN-SUGGESTION, STATE-SUGGESTION-01, STATE-SUGGESTION-02, STATE-SUGGESTION-03, STATE-SUGGESTION-04, STATE-SUGGESTION-05, STATE-SUGGESTION-06; exact SVG anchors are listed in coverage.md
FR/TR → specific AC references	FR-CATEGORYSUGGESTIONS-017#DEC-08; FR-NOMINATIONS-016#DEC-08; TR-NOMINATION-MODERATION-014#DEC-08; TR-SUGGESTION-REVIEW-015#DEC-08; TR-SUGGESTION-REVIEW-015#TR-15-C01
Priority	high
Platform/viewport	Phone Chromium/Android and Safari/iPhone where applicable; project matrix320x568,390x844,844x390;1280px at400%zoom and200%text enlargement. OS-native installation is a separate physical-device dependency.
Preconditions/roles	Bob has 10 lifetime wins, one open three-pair suggestion and no independent review yet.
Test data	Category Space with exactly 3 pairs; independent moderator Alice; one appeal to senior Cara.
Synchronization	Await the explicit observable conditions and source-defined deadlines below; no fixed sleeps. Harness timeouts do not create a product response-time SLA.
Cleanup	Close case-owned contexts and reset only isolated fixture accounts, rooms or content, including after failure. Preserve shared catalog and real profile data.
Automation readiness	Ready for automation once isolated UI fixture seeding and observations are available; documentation only.
Basis	Specified by cited designs/QBrain; new gap behavior is specified by UI-DEC-01..08. Synthetic fixture identities/data are test configurations.
Execution	Not run here. Existing historical status/evidence remains unchanged; new obligations remain pending/unsatisfied.

Ordered actions and observable results

Step	Action / condition	Observable expected result
1	Try opening another suggestion, then independently review the existing submission with a reason.	Only one suggestion remains open and the reasoned independent decision is recorded.
2	For a rejected example appeal once; for approved example complete required curation before activation.	Only permitted independent senior resolution succeeds; approved incomplete pairs are never playable.

Scenario

Feature: Verify TR-15: Category suggestion eligibility and review
  Scenario: TEST-SUGGESTIONREVIEW-115 design verification
    Given Bob has 10 lifetime wins, one open three-pair suggestion and no independent review yet.
    And the fixture data is Category Space with exactly 3 pairs; independent moderator Alice; one appeal to senior Cara.
    When Try opening another suggestion, then independently review the existing submission with a reason.
    Then Only one suggestion remains open and the reasoned independent decision is recorded.
    When For a rejected example appeal once; for approved example complete required curation before activation.
    Then Only permitted independent senior resolution succeeds; approved incomplete pairs are never playable.

Boundaries

The diagram's "request changes" action lacks a defined resubmission/status contract: Q-MOD-01 remains blocked.

Criterion references identify intended verification. Non-UI transaction, distribution, release/deployment and native OS guarantees retain separate technical/operational tests; this document is not a claim that a compound criterion passed.