Skip to content

FAPI_Meeting_Notes_2021 05 12_Atlantic

Nat Sakimura edited this page Jul 10, 2026 · 1 revision

FAPI WG Meeting Notes (2021-05-12)

The meeting was called to order at 14:05 UTC.

  • Attending: Bjorn, Dave, Nat, Ali, Brian, Daniel, Dima, Filip, Francis, Joseph, Kosuke, Lukasz, Ralph, Stuart, Takahiko, Torsten
  • Regrets: Vinod Anandan (self)
  • Guest:
  • Adopted as is.
  • Not open invite. Need to drop email to Joseph to get an invite.
  • A few presentations on FAPI.

May 11 - 13. Dave Tonge spoke.

Site URL: https://congress.openfuture.world/speakers/?utm_campaign=OBWC21&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=122216549&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-85MvO81z4sSX-dOrIbCIC77pfdwrqN1LhYxs6JTNfFHSk6PP3ROFz2iSRjFU6OdZZ-50Pr2u0HE4KChrgo0Y_r3ALFfw&utm_content=122216549&utm_source=hs_email

Presso: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6798194660650061824/?midToken=AQEYA6ePoVQTBg&midSig=37bbJEUaPKcpM1&trk=eml-email_notification_single_mentioned_you_in_this_01-notifications-1-hero~card~feed&trkEmail=eml-email_notification_single_mentioned_you_in_this_01-notifications-1-hero~card~feed-null-32hrd~kolciuly~45-null-voyagerOffline

Sizable directed funding for certification test. Mandating CIBA.

Nat to suggest setting up sub-committee to FAPI to deal with BG needs. Two co-chairs. Dave Tonge from OIDF and another from BG.

Trying to move CIBA Core to final. There are a couple of issues that are being covered by PRs.

  • Certs team is working on FAPI 1.0 Final test to go live at the end of this month. (Beta in one or two weeks.)
  • Directed funding from Brazil for their profile.
  • Simple Dynamic Client Registration being added.
  • Stuart Demoed the current one.
  • Discussed which files are to be processed automatically, and agreed.

This introduces replace action into the GM specification and attempts to include security considerations with respect to permission propagation.

  • Lukasz: If it is in fact merge, wouldn’t naming it “merge” make it more self-explanatory?
  • Brian: The replace action text seems okay. But the security considerations seems overreaching.
  • Dave: Use cases need to be collected.
  • Ralph: Delete and Revoke have different connotations, esp. legally. In UK, the ownership of the grant rests on TPPs. TPP opinion needed.
  • Dima: There are local requirements for Replace.
  • Brian: Security concerns - not realistic to propagate the change in Grant to AT immediately.
  • Separating the PR into two seems to be reasonable?

We had no time to discuss issues but Dave pointed out that new issue #411 should be considered re: HTTP signing.

  • none

The call adjourned at 15:00 UTC

Clone this wiki locally