Skip to content

FAPI_Meeting_Notes_2025 03 06_Pacific

Jump to bottom
Nat Sakimura edited this page Jul 10, 2026 · 1 revision

FAPI WG Agenda & Meeting Notes (2025-03-06)

The meeting was called to order at 00:00 UTC.

1.   Roll Call (Anoop)

  • Attendees: Nat, Dima, ED and Anoop
  • Regrets:

2.   Events Update

  • ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27/WG5: March 10-15, 2025 in Fairfax
  • ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27: March 17-18, 2025 in Fairfax
  • MOSIP Connect: March 11-13 in Philippines
  • IETF Bangkok: March 15-21
  • OIDF Workshop prior to IIW: April 7
  • IIW Spring 2025: April 8-10
  • OpenID Federation Interop Event, April 28-30, 2025
  • RSA 2025 (April 28-May 1) in San Francisco
  • EIC in Berlin (May 6-9)
  • Identiverse in Las Vegas (June 3-6)

2.1.   OIDF calendar

OIDF calendar on website is current: https://openid.net/calendar/

3.   Liaison/Ext Org

  • Working on annual FAPI recertifications for Open Finance Brazil and Open Insurance Brazil
  • January 2025 was one of the largest months for certification requests
  • Coordinating with Dima on a follow-up meeting with CMF in Chile
  • Dima is working on a reference architecture for a white paper
  • CMF will provide input while OIDF continues supporting their FAPI 2 adoption
  • Will notify all ecosystem partners about the FAPI 2 finalization
  • Japan Fintech Week activities (reported on Atlantic call - Takahiko Kawasaki:
    • FAPI and VC meeting at Pheno Lab in Tokyo was well-attended with a full house of 40-50 people
    • Good questions from the audience, including from government organizations interested in FAPI and VC activities

4.   Chilean Monetary Authority Discussion (review from Atlantic call discussion)

Dima Postnikov and Mark Haine reported on their meeting with the Chilean regulator:

  • Chile is planning to roll out open banking and has selected FAPI 2
  • They sought advice on whether to use a consent API approach or RAR plus Grant Management
  • The vendor appears to be steering them toward a consent API approach that the vendor has already implemented
  • The OIDF team presented pros and cons of both approaches:
    • Both are viable for individual ecosystems
    • Grant Management would help with standardization, security analysis, global expert support, and easier interoperability
    • Consent management might be easier for the sandbox provider to implement

Key points from the discussion:

  • CMF understands Grant Management is a newer spec with less maturity but has tests already
  • Chile is keen to achieve interoperability with other South American jurisdictions (Brazil, Colombia, Mexico)
  • OIDF didn't make a specific recommendation but indicated that for new implementers, they would lean toward recommending Grant Management + RAR to help progress global standards work
  • The team is preparing a write-up for CMF.

Dima Shared write https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iEY-9_Rm0HOKt75ecgsVVKG1IKgDTMUEMzTIdZ6Wjjg . Requested feedback from team.

Dima noted that work on Grant Management had been paused while waiting for ecosystem signals for adoption. The Chilean interest may be the signal they were waiting for.

5.   Re-Chartering WG

6.   Issues Discussion

7.   Next Call

Next call will be an Atlantinc Call.

Clone this wiki locally