Repository navigation
Bioeconomic Module Mathematical Formulation
This page presents the mathematical formulation of the Economic Module. It includes the equations used to represent accessible biomass, size-dependent harvest, fishing costs, profit, consumer demand, prices, social optimum and calibration relationships.
For the conceptual interpretation of these equations, see Bioeconomic Module Concepts and Assumptions. For the list of parameters, see Bioeconomic Module Parameters. For data needs and estimation workflow, see Bioeconomic Module Data Requirements and Bioeconomic Module Calibration.
Based on TQV18, QSK+18 and LDDS19.
Fishing costs depend on the availability of fish and the amount of fish harvested. We assume perfect selectivity with respect to species, but imperfect selectivity with respect to the size of species. Depending on the gear, larger or smaller fish of a species can be retained by the gear. The part of the population that could potentially be harvested is the accessible biomass. For example, with a trawl-like fishing net the probability of retainment increases with the size of the fish by a sigmoid pattern:
where
The total available (or accessible) biomass of a species
where
When harvesting a total biomass of
is the biomass of fish harvested from each size class in a given year.
The costs of harvesting fish increases with harvest and decreases when more fish are accessible.
Here,
Fishers' profit is the revenue from selling fish minus costs of harvesting:
The profit margin is the fraction of profits with respect to revenue:
Based on QR13, QRS+16, QSK+18, GQ16, TQV18 and LDDS19.
Consumers have preferences for certain species but also size classes of fish. Yet, when preferred species are rare, and thus expensive, consumers can shift their consumption towards more abundant species, depending on the elasticity of demand.
The more elastic demand is, the easier it is to substitute. The same holds for different size classes of fish, where demand is likely to be even more elastic; you would not pay an extremely higher price for one big fish than for the same weight of small fish.
The utility of fish consumption is:
If the species has only one size class, the consumer cannot substitute between size classes but can substitute between species, thus utility of fish consumption, for s = 1, is as follows:
where
Consumers pay for fish consumption, therefore total utility is:
where
Consumers maximise utility over the consumption of fish
and for s = 1:
In total, the utility derived from fish consumption is the benefit obtained from fish consumption of different species and size classes minus the costs needed for their extraction. Since individuals discount future utility (we prefer to have something today rather than tomorrow), the total net present value is:
where
A social planner, that accounts for consumer and producer surplus, would maximise this net present value over future control variables in the fishery, here future harvests and mesh sizes.
We estimate parameters of the cost function given catch, accessible biomass and profitability data. Species and size class preferences are estimated using the inverse demand function assuming market equilibrium.
The full calibration workflow is described in Bioeconomic Module Calibration. The equations below are included here because they define the mathematical relationships used for parameter estimation.
Rearranging the definition of the profit margin we get:
and we can estimate baseline costs
Considering each species as a monospecific model, we rearrange the demand function from SZQ23 to get:
Rearranging the inverse demand function we get:
where
and for s = 1:
The elasticities of substitution between size classes
Furthermore, given
we can estimate
TQV18: Olli Tahvonen, Martin F. Quaas, and Rüdiger Voss. Harvesting selectivity and stochastic recruitment in economic models of age-structured fisheries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92:659–676, 2018.
QSK+18: Martin F. Quaas, Max T. Stoeven, Bernd Klauer, Thomas Petersen, and Johannes Schiller. Windows of opportunity for sustainable fisheries management: the case of Eastern Baltic cod. Environmental and Resource Economics, 70(2):323–341, 2018.
LDDS19: Kira Lancker, A.L. Deppenmeier, T. Demissie, and J.O. Schmidt. Climate change adaptation and the role of fuel subsidies: an empirical bio-economic modeling study for an artisanal open-access fishery. PLoS ONE, 14(8):e0220433, 2019.
QR13: Martin F. Quaas and Till Requate. Sushi or fish fingers? Seafood diversity, collapsing fish stocks and multi-species fishery management. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(2):381–422, 2013.
QRS+16: Martin F. Quaas, Thorsten B. H. Reusch, Jörn O. Schmidt, Olli Tahvonen, and Rudi Voss. It is the econ- omy, stupid! Projecting the fate of fish populations using ecological-economic modeling. Global Change Biology, 22(1):264–270, 2016.
GQ16: Rolf A. Groeneveld and Martin F. Quaas. Promoting selective fisheries through certification? an analysis of the PNA unassociated-sets purse seine fishery. Fisheries Research, 182:69 – 78, 2016.
SZQ23: Hanna Schenk, Fabian Zimmermann and Martin F. Quaas. The economics of reversing fisheries-induced evolution. Nature Sustainability, 6:706 – 711, 2023.