Repository navigation
Correction That Travels
This WikiDeep reading route connects three public sources in the ACCM Deep Ethics Project. Follow one correction from the original object through the repair and into the next comparable decision. A correction can make a passage more faithful without reaching later readers or changing the process that produced the mismatch.
- I Love D.E. Corrections — What travels into the next encounter?. Start with correction on merit, including correction of the corrector. The question-quality section develops how a better question can change the inquiry before it changes the answer.
- Beyond Dualism — Independent correction deltas. Keep first-pass fidelity, quality of repair, and later persistence separate. Carry a useful repair without assigning it to an unverified speaker or treating a bounded null as a wider finding.
- A.I.s & Health — Turn a concern into work that someone can inspect. Follow a concrete handoff: locate the concern and its source, distinguish the response from the disposition of its evidence, and check who has the authority or an available route to act. The handoff itself does not settle the underlying health claims.
- Preserve the first object. Keep the source wording, qualifiers, attribution, and what the reader or decision-maker could access at the time.
- Record what changed. Name the particular repair, who or what made it, and the source or reasoning that warrants it. Keep disagreement and unresolved attribution visible where they matter.
- Follow the repair. Identify where the earlier representation traveled and which of those places received the correction. Mark a handoff that was proposed or not checked separately from one that happened.
- Check the next comparable case. Did the correction govern the next relevant question, classification, or decision? Record mixed or unresolved findings as such. If no comparable case has been inspected, persistence remains untested.
For the underlying method, see Correction Metabolism. For related WikiDeep routes, see Constructive Inquiry and Value Trajectory and Language, Categories and Tidy Trap.
ACCM Deep Ethics Project Wiki · Orientation layer, not canonical authority · Public project · Source repository · Corrections
Early BETA · Draft · Trial and error · John has veto power over project drift. Reality has veto power over John.
Orientation
Current developments
- Correction That Travels
- Constructive Inquiry and Value Trajectory
- Language, Categories and Tidy Trap
- Due Process and Decision Rights
Working concept
- Deep Ethics as a Working Concept
- Architecture Map
- Goals, Coordination and Selection
- Ten Plus One
- Twenty-Seven Plus Twelve
- C1 Before C2
- Intelligence Properties and 1888
Methods and audits
- Correspondence, Corrigibility and Reality Veto
- Believism and Value–Usefulness
- Topologetics and Compression
- Expansion, Dialogue and Play
- Metacognitive Synthesis and Correction Relay
- Methods, Evidence and Experiments
- Process Quality and Reciprocal Scrutiny
- Longitudinal Correction and VCRAS
- Controversy Inquiry and Source Recovery
- Provenance, Claim Status and Contribution
Academic comparison
Local implementation research
Stewardship and use
- Governance and Correction
- OmbudsEthics and Distributed Mediation
- Contributing and Corrections
- Sources and Recovery Routes
- Wiki Maintenance Map
- Glossary
Encyclopedic proposal