Skip to content

Research Early Clone Games

github-actions[bot] edited this page May 27, 2026 · 1 revision

Research into why Breakout spawned a richer, more enduring lineage of clones than Pong, and how cloning shaped the early game industry.


The Pong Clone Explosion (1972-1977)

Pong was released in November 1972 by Atari. By January 1974, approximately 50,000 coin-op video games had been produced, with 90% being ball-and-paddle games [1]. Atari had built less than a third of them; the rest were clones [1]. (Note: this figure is widely cited in secondary sources but the original primary source is unclear; treat it as an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a precise count.)

Timeline

  • November 1972: Pong released by Atari
  • March 1973: First U.S. clones appear: Volly (Ramtek), Rally (For-Play Manufacturing), Paddle Battle (Allied Leisure) [2]
  • July 1973: Japanese clones arrive: Pong Tron (Sega), Elepong (Taito); these actually beat Atari to the Japanese market [2]
  • August 1973: Tennis Tourney (Allied Leisure), the first four-player Pong variant [2]
  • 1973: Wimbledon (Nutting Associates), one of the first true-colour video games [2]
  • 1973-1974: At least 18 U.S. firms and 23 European companies competing in the electronic games market [1]

Why Cloning Was So Easy

Atari had not filed patents on Pong's solid-state technology [1]. The hardware was simple enough that a competitor could buy a cabinet, reverse-engineer it, and ship their own version within weeks. Nolan Bushnell called the cloners "jackals" but chose to outrun them with new games rather than litigate [1].

Allied Leisure's revenue rocketed from $1.5 million in 1972 to $11.4 million in 1973, entirely on cloned video games [2]. Gaming's future powerhouses (Sega, Taito, Midway, Nintendo) all entered the video game market specifically by selling Pong clones [1][2].

The Home Console Wave

General Instrument's AY-3-8500 "Ball & Paddle" chip (1976) was the catalyst. Roughly 5 million chips were sold, powering over 500 different game consoles from 82 manufacturers producing 162 console models by 1977 [3][4]. Coleco sold a million units of its first Telstar model alone [4]. The market was flooded.

The 1977 Crash

This oversaturation caused the first major industry crash. Prices dropped below production costs. Coleco nearly went bankrupt [4]. The dedicated-console market was effectively killed until the Atari 2600 revived home gaming with cartridge-based variety.


Breakout and Its Descendants (1976-Present)

Breakout was released by Atari in 1976, designed as a single-player evolution of Pong. It has since inspired thousands of clones [5] across nearly 50 years and every computing platform ever made.

Origins

Nolan Bushnell and Steve Bristow conceived Breakout to solve Pong's biggest commercial problem: it required two players. A lone person walking past an arcade cabinet was not a customer. Breakout eliminated that barrier entirely [6].

Steve Wozniak prototyped the hardware, achieving an ultra-compact 42-44 chip design (typical Atari games used 150-170 chips) over four consecutive nights at Atari [6]. The design was too compact for Atari to manufacture, so they rebuilt it with around 100 chips. Crucially, Wozniak later said: "A lot of features of the Apple II went in because I had designed Breakout for Atari" [6], including colour graphics, game paddle support, sound, and graphics commands in Integer BASIC.

Steve Jobs, who had been assigned the project, notoriously kept secret a $5,000 bonus for staying under 50 chips. Wozniak received only $350 and did not learn the truth for years [6].

The Two Waves of Breakout Clones

First Wave (1976-1985): Direct Reproductions

  • 1978: Gee Bee (Namco), adding pinball mechanics and three-sided level design [7]
  • Various home computer ports through the early 1980s
  • Wozniak himself wrote "Brick Out" as one of the first Apple II programs [6]

This wave was modest. Breakout clones existed, but they were not yet the flood.

Second Wave (1986 onward): The Arkanoid Revolution

Taito's Arkanoid (1986) was the watershed [8]. It proved the brick-breaker formula could be dramatically expanded:

  • Power-up capsules (extend bar, double ball, shooting laser, slow ball, extra life)
  • Multi-hit and indestructible blocks
  • Enemy sprites on the playfield
  • Boss fights (DOH)
  • 33 distinct level designs

Arkanoid became the highest-grossing table arcade cabinet in Japan in 1987 and the highest-grossing conversion kit in the U.S. that same year [8]. It was Arkanoid, not Breakout itself, that triggered the real explosion of the brick-breaker genre. As one retrospective put it: "Many different developers imitated Arkanoid and thanks to that deluge of similar games, brick breakers became a genre" [7].

Notable Breakout-Lineage Games

Year Game Significance
1976 Breakout (Atari) The original
1978 Gee Bee (Namco) Pinball hybrid
1986 Arkanoid (Taito) Revitalised and defined the genre
1987 Tournament Arkanoid, Revenge of Doh Sequels expanding the formula
1989 Off The Wall (Atari) Added "spin" physics
1991 MegaBall (Amiga) Pioneered "power-downs" (negative effects)
1995 Kirby's Block Ball (Game Boy) Three controllable paddle sides, boss fights
1996 First Touhou game Heavily influenced by Arkanoid gameplay
2001 Ricochet series (Reflexive) Elliptical shields, mouse controls
2004 BreakQuest Sophisticated physics, shape-shifting paddles
2009 Shatter 3D environments, dynamic boss battles
2011 Wizorb First major brick-breaker/RPG hybrid
2017 Arkanoid vs. Space Invaders Genre crossover
2018 Doughlings: Arcade Character transformations, RPG progression
2022 Arkanoid: Eternal Battle The lineage continues

Why Breakout Generated a Richer Clone Lineage Than Pong

The Numbers Are Nuanced

In raw product count, Pong arguably produced more clones: over 500 home consoles plus dozens of arcade cabinets [3]. But the vast majority were near-identical reproductions. Breakout's clones, by contrast, were variations: games that took the core concept and pushed it in genuinely new directions [5]. The distinction is between reproduction (copying the same thing) and variation (growing something new from the same seed).

The Design Space Argument

This is the core reason. Pong's design space is tiny:

  • Two paddles, a ball, a score
  • Variables to tweak: paddle size, ball speed, court shape, number of players
  • No progression, no levels, no items, no enemies

Breakout's design space is enormous:

  • Level design: Different brick arrangements create different challenges. Hundreds of unique layouts are possible from a simple grid.
  • Power-ups: Arkanoid demonstrated that dropping items from broken bricks creates an entire meta-game layer [8]. The power-up system alone supports infinite variation.
  • Brick types: Multi-hit, indestructible, explosive, moving. Each adds strategic depth.
  • Enemy sprites: Mobile hazards transform the game from physics puzzle to action game.
  • Boss fights: Natural endpoints for level sequences.
  • Paddle variations: Vertical paddles (Krakout on C64), multiple paddles (TRAZ), three-sided paddles (Kirby's Block Ball).
  • Genre hybridisation: RPG elements (Wizorb), pinball mechanics (Gee Bee), shooter mechanics, puzzle elements [7].

A game with a large design space rewards cloning because each clone can be genuinely different. A game with a small design space punishes it because each clone is just a copy.

Single-Player vs. Two-Player

Bushnell himself recognised the problem: "If you don't have someone to play with, you're not going to spend money on it" [6]. Pong required a second human. Breakout needed only one player, meaning every person near a cabinet or computer was a potential player, and every developer building a home version did not need to solve the opponent AI problem (or accept that the game was unplayable alone).

Progressive Structure vs. Endless Loop

Pong is a competitive loop with no endpoint. Breakout has levels that can be completed, creating a sense of progression and accomplishment. This structure naturally supports "more content" as a selling point. A Breakout clone with 50 levels is materially different from one with 33. A Pong clone with different paddle sizes is not.

The Arkanoid Amplifier

Pong clones largely died with the 1977 crash. Breakout got a second life in 1986 when Arkanoid proved the formula could sustain dramatic expansion [8]. Arkanoid then became the template for a second, even larger wave of cloning that has continued for nearly 40 years. Pong never had an equivalent reinvention.

The Space Invaders Connection

A detail that illustrates how far Breakout's design DNA reaches: Tomohiro Nishikado created Space Invaders (1978) directly inspired by Breakout [9]. He was struck by how satisfying it felt to clear all the blocks and wanted to recreate that feeling in a shooting format. Space Invaders is, at its core, "Breakout where the bricks move and shoot back." This means Breakout's influence flows through the entire shoot-em-up genre, not just through direct brick-breaker clones.


The Modern Era: Brick Breakers Thrive, Pong Fades (2010s-2020s)

The divergence between Pong and Breakout's lineages has only widened in the modern era. Brick breakers are a commercially massive genre across mobile and PC. Pong-style games are essentially extinct as a commercial category.

Mobile: A Brick-Breaker Gold Rush

According to Sensor Tower, the Pinball/Brick Breaker mobile sub-genre has accumulated 948 million all-time worldwide downloads and earned $296 million in revenue [10]. The genre's top earners demonstrate how far the formula has stretched:

Game Year Key Metric
World Flipper (CyberAgent/Cygames) 2019 $71M lifetime revenue; pinball + RPG + gacha [10]
PunBall (Habby) 2021 $39M lifetime revenue; roguelite + RPG + brick breaker [10]
Bricks Breaker Quest (mobirix) 2017 ~100M downloads; $130K/month revenue; 10% D60 retention [11]
Bricks n Balls (PeopleFun) 2018 530K+ weekly active users in U.S. alone (Q4 2023) [11]
Ballz (Ketchapp/Ubisoft) 2017 10M+ Google Play downloads; hit #1 free on both stores [12]
Idle Brick Breaker (Tech Tree Games) 2020 2.2M downloads [10]

New brick breaker titles continue launching in 2025: Hit Ball (5ft LTD), Brick Blast (Easybrain), and Bricks Breaker RPG (Whim Bear Studios) among others [10][11].

PC/Steam: Ball x Pit and the Genre's Vindication

The headline story of 2025 is Ball x Pit, a Breakout + roguelike + city-building game by solo developer Kenny Sun, published by Devolver Digital:

  • 1 million copies sold by December 2025 [13]
  • $11 million+ revenue [14]
  • 100,000 copies in the first 24 hours; 300,000 in five days [15]
  • Number 1 on the Steam downloads chart on day one [15]
  • 96% positive on Steam (13,827 reviews); Metacritic 84-89 [13]
  • Nominated at The Game Awards 2025, BAFTA Games Awards, and IGF [13]
  • GamesRadar headline: "forever proving mankind yearns for 1976 Atari icon Breakout" [15]

Other recent PC brick breakers: Shatter Remastered Deluxe (2022, praised as best-in-class) [16], Breakout: Recharged (Atari, 2022, official revival with 50 challenge levels), Brick Odyssey (2024, roguelike brick breaker with RPG progression), and Arkanoid: Eternal Battle (2022, an ambitious entry featuring a 25-player battle royale mode) [17].

Modern Pong: A Quieter Story

By contrast, Pong-style games have seen far less modern activity:

  • PONG Quest (Atari, 2020): A creative take that reimagined Pong as a dungeon-crawling RPG where you play as a paddle. It found a small but appreciative audience (53 Steam reviews) [18].
  • Pong: The Arcade Classic exists on iOS but has not reached top charts [18].
  • No Pong game appears on top-downloaded or top-grossing mobile lists for 2024 or 2025.

Pong's most interesting spiritual successors have found dedicated followings in the competitive space: Windjammers 2 (2022, competitive frisbee, all-time peak of 353 concurrent Steam players) [19] and Lethal League Blaze (2018, ball-based fighting game, 97% positive reviews from 6,579 reviewers, 200-500K owners) [20]. Both are well-loved by their communities, though they occupy a niche rather than a mainstream audience.

Genre Hybridisation: How Brick Breakers Evolved

The brick breaker formula has been crossed with nearly every popular modern game mechanic:

  • Idle/Incremental: Idle Brick Breaker (2.2M downloads), Idle Breakout (4.6/5 on itch.io with 874 ratings). Players watch balls auto-destroy bricks while upgrading multipliers [21].
  • Roguelike/Roguelite: Ball x Pit (1M copies) [13], PunBall ($39M revenue) [10], Brick Odyssey, Roguebreaker, BrickLike. Short runs with power-up choices, meta-progression, boss fights.
  • RPG: Wizorb (2011, pioneer), Bricks Breaker RPG (2025). XP, character progression, town-building [7].
  • Gacha/Live Service: World Flipper ($71M revenue before servers shut down in 2024 due to revenue instability) [10][22].
  • Puzzle/Strategy: Bricks n Balls and Bricks Breaker Quest turned brick breaking into a number-puzzle where you aim shots to optimally reduce numbered bricks. The "aim-and-fire" variant is now arguably more popular than classic Arkanoid-style on mobile [11].
  • Survivor-like: Ball x Pit combines brick breaking with survivor-like wave progression [15].

The Itch.io Signal

On itch.io, the "pong" tag returns 2,547 games, while "breakout" returns 1,836 [21]. The higher Pong count likely reflects the game's role as a foundational learning project for new developers: its simplicity (two paddles, one ball) makes it one of the most common first games people build. Among commercially-oriented and higher-rated projects, brick breakers tend to show more variety and ambition [21].

The Numbers in Context

Metric Brick Breakers Pong-Style
Mobile all-time downloads 948M [10] Minimal chart presence
Top single-game revenue (mobile) $71M (World Flipper) [10] No top-grossing entries
Best-selling modern game (PC) 1M copies, $11M+ (Ball x Pit) [13][14] PONG Quest (niche audience) [18]
Genre hybridisation Idle, roguelike, RPG, gacha, puzzle, survivor Competitive/fighting (Lethal League, Windjammers)
New releases (2024-2025) Dozens across mobile and PC Very few

The Idle Genre as a Clone Lineage (2010s–2020s)

The idle and incremental genre is another case where a foundational title spawned an entire category of clones. The arc parallels the Pong-to-Breakout story at a smaller scale and a faster tempo, and ends in a category that has become commercially serious in the space of a decade and a half.

Origins and the foundational clone step

The term "idle" originates with Progress Quest (2002), an RPG that plays itself. The category as a commercial force dates to 2010, when Ian Bogost released Cow Clicker on Facebook as a parody of the extractive mechanics of social games [25]. Cow Clicker went viral in a way Bogost intended to critique. Cookie Clicker (Julien Thiennot, 2013) followed [26], and Bogost has publicly named it as the direct inheritor of what Cow Clicker was parodying [25]. The progression from parody to genre-defining commercial hit in three years is the idle equivalent of the Breakout-to-Arkanoid amplifier move: a foundational concept, then a release that demonstrated how wide the design space really was.

The critical conversation around the category matured alongside it. The A.V. Club piece "Idle Threat: What Incremental Games Say about Our Relationship to Work" [27] framed idles as commentary on late-capitalist labour conditions. Sebastian Deterding's paper "Progress Wars: Idle Games and the Demarcation of 'Real' Games" [28] took the category seriously as a form of play. Frank Lantz's Universal Paperclips (2017) sits inside that conversation as the genre's most self-aware statement, dramatising Nick Bostrom's paperclip-maximiser thought experiment through text and buttons. Lantz has called his own work "playable philosophy."

The commercial arc

Market research places the global idle-games market at $2.5 billion in 2024, projected to grow at a 10.8% CAGR through the early 2030s [29]. A separate Growth Market Reports estimate gives a higher 2024 figure of $3.4 billion, forecasting $9.7 billion by 2033 at a 12.5% CAGR [30]. The two estimates differ on scale; both agree on direction.

Steam release data is more concrete. The number of idle games released on Steam grew 30% year-on-year in 2023 and 68% year-on-year in 2024 [29]. In an analysis of 2025 Steam indie hits (releases over 1,000 reviews), idle and incremental placed fifth by volume with 27 hits, behind narrative (51), simulation (43), horror (39), and RPG (28) [31]. A category treated as marginal a decade ago now reaches hit volume comparable to the established indie genres.

Variation as the clone pattern

The idle-genre clone arc is analytically similar to Breakout's: a core loop that rewards variation, and a design space that keeps opening as each new release pushes on a different axis.

Axis of variation Example releases
Theme and progression curve NGU Idle, Melvor Idle, Clicker Heroes, AdVenture Capitalist, Leaf Blower Revolution
Format compression (text-only) A Dark Room, Universal Paperclips, Candy Box, Kittens Game, Antimatter Dimensions
Mobile cozy illustration Cats and Soup, Tsuki Adventure, Neko Atsume
Minimalist incrementals Gnorp Apologue, SPACEPLAN, A Game About Feeding A Black Hole
Desktop-resident hybrids Rusty's Retirement (550K+ copies by mid-2025), Desktopia, Desktop Meadow
Diegetic-metaphor interfaces Godville (newspaper), Black Hole Fishing (fishing magazine as shop)

The category behaves like Breakout's descendants rather than Pong's. Each new release is a variation on the core loop rather than a reproduction of a prior release. The design space rewards the cloners for trying something new.


Other Early Clone Phenomena (Context)

Space Invaders (1978)

By 1980, over 100 Space Invaders clones existed worldwide [23]. The term "Invader game" became a generic classification. Notable clones:

  • Space Fever and SF-HiSplitter (Nintendo, 1979): Nintendo's entry into arcade games was literally a Space Invaders clone [23]
  • Space King (Konami, 1978)
  • IPM Invader (Irem, 1979): sold 50,000 cabinets [23]
  • Cosmic Monsters (Universal, 1979)
  • Galaxian (Namco, 1979) and Galaga (1981) evolved the formula into something distinctly their own

Pac-Man (1980)

Generated $150 million in sales between October 1980 and December 1981, triggering hundreds of clones [24]:

  • Ms. Pac-Man (Bally Midway): originally developed without Namco's authorization, later officially adopted [24]
  • K.C. Munchkin! (Philips): the subject of a landmark copyright case [3]
  • Hangly-Man, Puckman, Packri-Monster, Mighty Mouth, Hungry Horace, and many more [24]

Others

  • Asteroids: At least 8 personal computer clones by December 1981 [3]
  • Donkey Kong: Nintendo estimated over $100 million in losses from cloning [3]
  • Frogger: Over 100 documented clones [5]
  • Tetris: Possibly the most ported and cloned game of all time [3]

The Clone Culture: Why It Was the Default

Economics

If a game was already proven popular, cloning it was a safe, fast investment compared to developing something original with unknown sales potential [3].

No Legal Protection

In the 1970s it was unclear whether video games could even be copyrighted. In Japan, video games were explicitly not eligible for copyright, leading companies to register with the U.S. Copyright Office as a workaround [3]. Ideas and mechanics cannot be copyrighted; only their specific expression can. This gap made cloning legally feasible throughout the era and beyond.

Simple Hardware

Early arcade games used discrete logic chips that could be reverse-engineered by purchasing a single cabinet [1]. The AY-3-8500 chip turned Pong into a commodity anyone could manufacture [3][4].

Field-Testing Culture

Arcade games were tested in limited numbers. Once word spread about a hit, competitors would "scope the game and rush to make a clone" before the original could achieve full distribution [3].


The Legal Landscape

Case Year Outcome Precedent
Magnavox v. Atari et al. 1974-76 Atari settled for $1.5M; Magnavox won or settled every case, accumulating over $100M [1] Pong-like games infringed Baer's patents
Atari v. North American Philips (Pac-Man vs. K.C. Munchkin!) 1981-82 Ruled for Atari [3] Copying a game's unique expression (not just mechanics) is infringement
Atari v. Amusement World (Asteroids vs. Meteors) 1982 Ruled for the clone maker [3] "Scenes a faire" doctrine: certain elements are inherent to a genre and cannot be owned
Midway v. Artic International Early 1980s Ruled for Midway [3] Arcade game aspects are copyrightable despite transient screen images
Stern Electronics v. Kaufman Early 1980s Ruled for Stern [3] A game's "look and feel" is fixed and copyrightable
Atari Games Corp. v. Oman Late 1980s Overturned Copyright Office refusal (Ruth Bader Ginsburg ruling) [3] Even simple games like Breakout deserve copyright protection

Key Figures

Nolan Bushnell (b. 1943): Co-founded Atari. Saw Magnavox Odyssey's tennis game in May 1972 and directed Al Alcorn to create Pong. Co-designed Breakout's concept with Steve Bristow, transforming Pong from a two-player competition into a single-player experience [1][6].

Al Alcorn (b. 1948): Designed and built Pong as Atari employee #3. Created the paddle segmentation, ball acceleration, and sound effects using the sync generator. The assignment was presented to him as a "training exercise" [1].

Steve Wozniak (b. 1950): Prototyped Breakout's hardware. His experience directly influenced the Apple II's design. Wrote "Brick Out" as one of the Apple II's first programs [6].

Ralph Baer (1922-2014): "The Father of Video Games." Filed the first video game patent in 1971. Through Magnavox and Sanders, his patents won over $100 million in damages from Pong clone makers over 20 years [1].

Tomohiro Nishikado (b. 1944): Created Space Invaders at Taito in 1978, directly inspired by Breakout. His insight that Breakout's appeal was about progressive destruction rather than paddle physics produced one of the most important design evolutions in early arcade history [9].


Summary: The Core Insight

Pong was widely reproduced but not widely varied. Its design space was too small; there were not enough knobs to turn. Breakout's design, by moving to single-player, adding a destructible environment, and introducing a level-based structure, opened up an enormous space for variation. Arkanoid proved that space could be expanded even further with power-ups, enemies, and bosses [8]. The result: Breakout became not just a game but a genre, one that is still producing new entries nearly 50 years later.

The modern evidence reinforces this. Brick breakers have accumulated 948 million mobile downloads and $296 million in revenue [10]. Ball x Pit sold a million copies on PC in 2025 [13]. Pong-style games have found dedicated communities (Lethal League Blaze's 97% positive reviews speak for themselves [20]) but have not achieved the same commercial scale. The design space argument is not just a historical observation; it continues to play out in real time.

The distinction between reproduction and variation is the key to understanding why some games get cloned and forgotten, while others get cloned and become the seed of something that outlasts them.


Sources

Clone this wiki locally