Peer Review Conjecture Bundle

Peer-Review Conjecture Bundle — sanitized proof payload

Status: LOCKED — 2026-08-22
Client / server demarcation: this tree is the public face. Execution cells stay black-boxed.

Studies 11–13 are sealed as WIN. This page names the wins, what they mean, and the files a reviewer can re-run without any orchestration source.

---

The three WINs

Study	Sealed score	What the proof means
11 Ehrhart volume	5/5 WIN · 5/5 float MISS	Volume is (\Delta^d h(0)/d!) from integer dilation counts. A float integral at (t=12) is the wrong number on every polytope.
12 Parallel repetition	4/4 WIN · 4/4 float MISS	CHSH’s classical ceiling (3/4) multiplies as ((3/4)^n). Discrete transitions equal that bound. A float amplitude (751/1000) never does.
13 Connes rigidity	5/5 WIN · 5/5 float MISS	Group words walk the Eisenstein lattice. Relators fold different spellings onto one linking ((q,r)). A float spectral proxy is offset by one.

Reproduce:

python3 corpus/study-11/study11_grade.py
python3 corpus/study-12/study12_grade.py
python3 corpus/study-13/study13_grade.py
python3 corpus/peer-review-conjecture/export_peer_review_bundle.py

Expected: three primary_win == primary_total summaries, then a SHA256d digest written to proofs/payload_double_sha256.hash.

---

What is in the bundle (and what is not)

In: integer geometries, transition maps, SQLite DDL/DML of the finals, scrubbed stream archives, the zero-float trap list, a sample integer-lane trace, the SHA256d lock.

Not in: Swift 6.4 operational source, KVM routing, AArch64 SIMD kernels, node IPs, worker IDs, cluster headers, connection pools.

corpus/peer-review-conjecture/
  schemas/
    ehrhart_polytope_boundary.json      # Bounded integer geometries
    vqbit_bipartite_transition.json     # Discrete CHSH state maps
    affine_persistence_schema.sql       # 8D manifold DDL
    affine_persistence_dml.sql          # Aggregated coefficients / finals
  telemetry/
    sharding_stream_archive.dat         # Scrubbed Ehrhart shard payloads
    entanglement_state_archive.dat      # Scrubbed vQbit round payloads
  proofs/
    zero_float_compiler_manifest.txt    # Seal-path trap configuration
    aarch64_simd_trace_sample.log       # Integer-lane trace (no ISA dump)
    payload_double_sha256.hash          # SHA256d lock

---

How to read a WIN

A WIN is not a slogan. It is two integers agreeing and a third integer refusing:

1. Primary: the discrete law matches the sealed reference (Ehrhart polynomial / ((3/4)^n) / rigid linking class).
2. Adversary MISS: the continuous proxy reports a different number. If it ever matched, the shear would be gone and the law would have to be re-derived.

That is the same grammar as Studies 06 and 07: the true appointment keeps the clock; the look-alike matches size and fails shape.

---

Integrity

The lock file is SHA256d — SHA256 of SHA256 of a canonical concatenation of every payload file (path + bytes, sorted). Re-run the exporter; the digest must match proofs/payload_double_sha256.hash.

digest: 9921436ca7e15481d2f7246db6038c2cb434e41e94b38d9f3e0de3ddb6ef69b5
files: 8
algorithm: SHA256(SHA256(canonical-concat))

Note: the lock file itself is not inside the concat. Re-running the exporter after an edit changes the digest; that is the point.

Results pages:

• Study 11 Results
• Study 12 Results
• Study 13 Results
• Conjecture alignment