Skip to content

Study 12 Quantum Parallel Repetition Shear

rg78803 edited this page Aug 25, 2026 · 5 revisions

Study 12 — Quantum Parallel Repetition Shear

Status: CHARTER SEALED — 2026-08-22 · LIVE CLAIM
Program: Conjecture Alignment · Shear Studies Index · Fourier Phantom

Surface URL / key Cited vs sealed
Claim UI https://affine.earth/language-game/study-12-chance.html sealed POST
IDE https://affine.earth/language-game/ide.html#qpr file template; no auto-POST
Look https://affine.earth/language-game/#researcher GET only
Affine story https://affine.earth/language-game/#story/Study-12-Quantum-Parallel-Repetition-Shear this charter
Court POST /language-invariant/game/chance/ingest rounds=3 sealed 27/64 / 27/64 · STUDY12_QPR_PROVEN · float 1.5 → HTTP 400
Humanity Discrete repetition bounds without a second amplitude law float adversary 751/1000 is the sealed miss
DFT map many-electron (\psi), Born amplitudes Anima approximates a probability in floats. Study 12 replaces (\psi) with (W_n\in\mathbb{Q}).

For every reader

Quantum parallel repetition asks: if Alice and Bob play a nonlocal game (G) in parallel (n) times, how fast does the winning probability decay? The standard proof uses continuous amplitudes and tensor products in (\mathbb{C}). UUM-8D replaces amplitudes with vQbit primitives and Jordan-bonded entanglement matrices — discrete state transitions with exact rationals.

This study will grade whether integer-bounded parallel repetition bounds match published thresholds — and whether float amplitude models shear the bound.

LIVE CLAIM — apex chance returns STUDY12_QPR_PROVEN. Named receipt is the court.


The forcing and the track

Piece Instantiation
Forcing Parallel repetition index (n) (integer rounds)
Clock Round index (k=1\ldots n)
Track Bipartite strategy simplex in the integer manifold
Raw archive Published game tables (CHSH, Magic Square, etc.) with exact rational winning thresholds
Adversary Float amplitude product model — continuous (\mathbb{C}^{d^n}) tensor
Future events New games registered before bounds are examined

UUM-8D integration path

Standard UUM-8D
Complex amplitude (\alpha\in\mathbb{C}) vQbit ((\tau, \mathrm{phase}, \mathrm{amplitude})) with unit-norm rational
Tensor product Hilbert space Jordan algebra state on M⁸ = S⁴ × C⁴
Winning probability (float) Ordinal comparison via cross-multiplication on (\mathbb{Q})
Parallel repetition bound Discrete collapse turn count at sealed (\chi_{\max})

Reference substrate map: cells/xcode/Sources/InvariantCompiler/QuantumShearMap.swift — transport criterion per algorithm row.


Success criteria (pre-registration)

  1. Integer Jordan-bonded repetition bound (\le) published upper bound for CHSH at (n=1,2,4,8).
  2. Float amplitude adversary over- or under-estimates the sealed bound at least once (shear measurable).
  3. No Float/Double on the seal path.

Status

LIVE CLAIM — named chance receipt. Not OPEN.

Replacement trio: this page kills the wavefunction · 11 kills continuous density · 13 kills KS potential. Synthesis: Fourier Phantom.

When complete, results will publish as Study-12-Quantum-Parallel-Repetition-Results.md.

⚡ Paradigm

✅ Sealed results

☀️🌑 Eclipse 2026

🌊 LIVE CLAIM

🌊 OPEN (no data)

Clone this wiki locally