Skip to content

Study 11 Ehrhart Volume Shear

rg78803 edited this page Aug 25, 2026 · 5 revisions

Study 11 — Ehrhart Volume Shear: lattice points vs float volume

Status: LAW FROZEN — 2026-08-22 · LIVE CLAIM
Program: Shear Studies Index · Zero Float · Zero Shear · Fourier Phantom

Surface URL / key Cited vs sealed
Claim UI https://affine.earth/language-game/study-11-ehrhart.html sealed POST
IDE https://affine.earth/language-game/ide.html#ehrhart-volume file template; no auto-POST
Look https://affine.earth/language-game/#researcher GET only
Affine story https://affine.earth/language-game/#story/Study-11-Ehrhart-Volume-Shear this charter
Court POST /language-invariant/game/geometry/ingest polytope_id=unit_square dilation=12 sealed count 169 vol 1/1 · float 1.5 → HTTP 400 REFUSED_FLOAT
DFT map Hohenberg–Kohn (\int\rho(r),dr) density is Ehrhart count, not a float tensor. Anima FNO density is their claim.

Replacement trio: 12 kills (\psi) · this page kills continuous density · 13 kills KS potential. Synthesis: Fourier Phantom.


For every reader

  1. Volume is a lattice appointment, not an integral. Count integer points in dilated polytope (tP); the leading coefficient of the Ehrhart polynomial (h_P(t)=|tP\cap\mathbb{Z}^d|) is the exact rational volume — no floats.
  2. Continuous geometry shears the count. A float triangulation predicts (\mathrm{round}(\mathrm{vol}(P)\cdot t^d)); that prediction misses on every corpus polytope at the sealed dilation.
  3. UUM-8D native fit. Integer polytope boundaries, Jordan-bonded state transitions — this is the arithmetic the substrate was built to seal.

Results: Study 11 Results · Corpus: Study 11 Corpus

5 / 5 WIN. Float adversary 5 / 5 MISS.


The forcing and the track

Piece Instantiation
Forcing Integer dilation (t\in\mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0}) applied to a lattice polytope (P\subset\mathbb{Z}^d)
Clock The dilation index (t) — the appointment is (h_P(t)), not a Riemann sum
Track Integer lattice (\mathbb{Z}^d); points must land inside exact facet halfspaces
Raw archive Vertex lists in Corpus — public, deterministic, no floats
Adversary Float simplex-triangulation volume (\times, t^d), rounded to integer
Future events Any new lattice polytope registered before its counts are examined

Why Ehrhart is native to UUM-8D

Ehrhart theory asks: how many integer lattice points live inside a scaled convex polytope? That question is already the substrate's geometry:

  • Polytope facets are affine halfspace inequalities with integer coefficients.
  • Dilations are exact integer maps on vertex coordinates.
  • Volume emerges as the leading coefficient of (h_P(t)) via the (d)-fold forward difference (\Delta^d h(0)/d!) — a pure integer operation on the count table.
  • No measure theory, no floating quadrature, no IEEE-754 shear.

The continuous-math habit integrates (P\subset\mathbb{R}^d) with floats and calls the debris "volume." When the same polytope is graded on the integer lattice, float volume misses the sealed count at (t=12) on every corpus member — the shear is measurable.


Frozen law (sealed 2026-08-22T16:00:00Z)

Symbol Meaning Sealed rule
count(P,t) Lattice points in (tP) Integer bbox enumeration + exact facet halfspaces
vol(P) Euclidean volume (\Delta^d h(0)/d!) as exact rational num/den
T_max Maximum dilation graded 12
WIN Count table matches reference Ehrhart polynomial for (t=0\ldots T_{\max}) and vol_fd == vol_exp
Adversary MISS round(float_vol(P) * T_max^d) != count(P, T_max) Required on every corpus row

No float crosses the seal path. Volume comparisons use Fraction rationals only.


What this proves

Claim Verdict
Integer lattice counting recovers exact Ehrhart polynomials 5/5 WIN
Leading coefficient equals exact rational volume 5/5 WIN
Float triangulation volume predicts lattice counts 5/5 MISS (adversary)

Read next

⚡ Paradigm

✅ Sealed results

☀️🌑 Eclipse 2026

🌊 LIVE CLAIM

🌊 OPEN (no data)

Clone this wiki locally