Question AUR 01

AUR-01 What useful navigation can a first-time visitor receive from a personal Aura, the proposed AI assistant, while choosing how much personal context to share?

Start here · Questions · Progress · People decide

Why this matters

Residents and visitors should be able to reach essential help as guests, then add remembered preferences or other personal context when it helps them.

What to bring back

Walk through an everyday visit and a disaster visit with optional personal details, source-linked answers, clear local availability and an understandable exit. Demonstrate essential information access for a guest and a returning Aura user. Keep the separate Genesis programme a voluntary further path.

What we know so far

• Verse_Box_Trial_Proposal_Version_1_Corrected.pdf (pp.4,8,14,16)
• comprehensive rebuild plan — reviewed source; public copy can be added through the evidence process
• Professional review and comparison of proposed improvements (When this work overlaps professional or public-authority responsibilities, compare the proposal and Luke's research with applicable industry/global best practice and relevant legal-engine sources. Record differences, reasonable improvements and deficiencies, with the responsible reviewer and response. Routine authorised drafting and wiki work can advance.)
• Council plan crosswalk and proposed Aura integration (Relevant question row identifies the management/recovery source section and printed/PDF page. AI-generated analysis, 21 October 2026; proposed checks and actual review/operating agreements retain separate status.)

Starting idea for review: For human consideration: begin with assistance for the person's current task and invite useful personal context as they choose.

AI-generated potential answers

For discussion and review · research checked 2026-10-20. These are AI-generated options and transfer assessments. The user's request and research method identify the source of this work. The source catalogue states what the references establish. The decision and approval record retains its own status.

Offer guest navigation first, with an optional personal Aura helping someone find notices, services and the next useful step. Let the person choose the context shared for that task. Show the source, its age and a clear path to human assistance and session exit.

Source-linked guest assistance and an optional Aura

AI-generated adaptation of an existing pattern. Begin with accessible search and task cards over approved local material. Compare optional selective personal sharing with a guest-only journey, keeping the same essential public service available to each visitor.

Research basis: Kiwix Hotspots: an offline library over a local Wi-Fi network · Solid FAQ: personal data sharing, storage and copies · Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2.

A chosen multimodal companion

AI-generated future concept. Explore an Aura explaining the same task through speech, text or XR using the person's chosen context. Evaluate comprehension, privacy, permissions and energy before claiming richer interaction improves the experience.

Research basis: llama.cpp: local and hosted language-model inference · Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2.

Examples and local differences

• Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2: AI transfer assessment: Accessibility criteria apply to kiosk web content across different input and presentation methods. Local difference to check: Local testing must include people without devices, accounts, personal profiles, quiet surroundings or reliable internet.

Evidence to bring back next

• Observe an everyday visit and an outage visit for guests and returning Aura users.
• Check comprehension, source retrieval, minimal disclosure and a clean exit with people using different access methods.

People and connected choices

Who reviews: Proposed personal-AI product lead and accessibility lead (unconfirmed)

Connected questions: OPS-01, DAT-01, SW-05

Work state: open. Assigned person or AI assistant: Ready to be assigned.

Research and alternatives can move ahead while connected decisions develop. Before acting on a choice, check the people, evidence and approved scope in People decide.