Repository navigation
Question TWIN 02
TWIN-02 Which demanding exercises will show how the network serves people through combined, prolonged failures?
Start here · Questions · Progress · People decide
Practising the interaction of storms, fire, power loss, unavailable staff, ferry disruption and depleted supplies can reveal the improvements that matter most.
Build a dated exercise set with starting conditions, timed events, resource assumptions, roles, expected service, observations and pause points. Prioritise common local hazards and include longer-duration dependency failures. Record wider horizon scenarios as assumptions for learning, with the service requirements from OPS-01 kept central.
- comprehensive rebuild plan — reviewed source; public copy can be added through the evidence process
- supporting research — reviewed source; public copy can be added through the evidence process
- Straddie_Disaster_Kiosk_Pitch.pdf
- Web3_Sensorium_for_Science_Debate.pdf (pp.19-22)
- Professional review and comparison of proposed improvements (When this work overlaps professional or public-authority responsibilities, compare the proposal and Luke's research with applicable industry/global best practice and relevant legal-engine sources. Record differences, reasonable improvements and deficiencies, with the responsible reviewer and response. Routine authorised drafting and wiki work can advance.)
- Council plan crosswalk and proposed Aura integration (Relevant question row identifies the management/recovery source section and printed/PDF page. AI-generated analysis, 21 October 2026; proposed checks and actual review/operating agreements retain separate status.)
For discussion and review · research checked 2026-10-20. These are AI-generated options and transfer assessments. The user's request and research method identify the source of this work. The source catalogue states what the references establish. The decision and approval record retains its own status.
Build a 2–3-day practical exercise with people and equipment, walking through interruptions to power, communications, ferries, supplies and available staff. Begin with storms, cyclones and fire. Digital twins can simulate any chosen length of disruption; record simulated time separately from actual computer runtime. Clearly identify practice events and record simulation, bench measurements and field demonstrations as distinct evidence.
AI-generated adaptation of an existing pattern. Use a common exercise identifier, dated source pack and explicit practice notices. Rehearse service retained at each step before introducing field equipment, comparing a simple timeline with the proposed digital model.
Research basis: Common Alerting Protocol Version 1.2 · NSW Spatial Services: mapping and the Emergency Management Digital Twin.
AI-generated future concept. Explore a shared scenario where people and Auras practise handovers and compare changing resource choices. Keep advanced-agent performance and simulated robot tasks as measured exercise assumptions, with readable participation available outside XR.
Research basis: Our Changing City: Wellington's public climate-adaptation digital installation · NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0: core functions.
- Common Alerting Protocol Version 1.2: AI transfer assessment: Warning-message formats explicitly distinguish an exercise from actual public instructions. Local difference to check: The island exercise must additionally isolate its publishing destinations, explain fictional resources and preserve real emergency contact routes.
- Agree starting conditions and measures with participating service and technical reviewers.
- Run lost staff cover, ferry suspension, limited charging and a failed hub in different sequences; compare retained service and handovers.
Who reviews: Proposed exercise director and service assurance lead (unconfirmed)
Connected questions: OPS-01, TWIN-01
Work state: open. Assigned person or AI assistant: Ready to be assigned.
Research and alternatives can move ahead while connected decisions develop. Before acting on a choice, check the people, evidence and approved scope in People decide.
Growing capability together · Planning and design underway · People decide · Repository
Aura Disaster Resilience
- Start here
- The whole system
- About and topic slugs
- First choices
- All-weather design
- Questions
- Progress
- Working together
- People decide
- Professional review
- AI assistant jobs
- Council integration
- Council plan crosswalk
- Guardian IMS and QIT Plus
- Ecosystem
- Agreed direction
- Evidence
- Source library
- AI research and prompt
- Research sources
- Useful words/glossary
- Rights and discovery
Work areas
- Everyday service and disaster work
- Weather-ready kiosks and places
- Energy and backup power
- Connections and messages
- Information people can trust
- Software and device care
- Personal Aura and learning
- Place models and practice exercises
- Community and operating responsibility
- Budget and continuing support
- Tests and field learning
- Project connections
- Working together and human review