Repository navigation
Question ECO 04
ECO-04 How will offers, supply information and requests connect residents with responsible relief operators while respecting household privacy?
Start here · Questions · Progress · People decide
A resource service becomes useful when everyone can distinguish an offer, an available item, an accepted request and a completed handover.
Define an exchange record for the item or service, quantity, time, location-sharing scope, confidence in availability, responsible operator, consent and acknowledgement. Map prospective food, water, charging, equipment and assistance connections. Mark candidate partners as awaiting agreement and rehearse a request with each step's status and a documented handover.
- comprehensive rebuild plan — reviewed source; public copy can be added through the evidence process
- supporting research — reviewed source; public copy can be added through the evidence process
- site-data.js (supplier-request and crew-roster definitions)
- funding.html (separate funding and effort records)
- Professional review and comparison of proposed improvements (When this work overlaps professional or public-authority responsibilities, compare the proposal and Luke's research with applicable industry/global best practice and relevant legal-engine sources. Record differences, reasonable improvements and deficiencies, with the responsible reviewer and response. Routine authorised drafting and wiki work can advance.)
- Council plan crosswalk and proposed Aura integration (Relevant question row identifies the management/recovery source section and printed/PDF page. AI-generated analysis, 21 October 2026; proposed checks and actual review/operating agreements retain separate status.)
For discussion and review · research checked 2026-10-20. These are AI-generated options and transfer assessments. The user's request and research method identify the source of this work. The source catalogue states what the references establish. The decision and approval record retains its own status.
Keep an offer, checked available stock, a person's request, operator acceptance and completed handover as separate records. Share household details only with the agreed recipients. Connect Shared Table and other supply proposals through named custodians, consent, usable quantities and clearly confirmed participation.
AI-generated adaptation of an existing pattern. Trial ODK-style collection and a separate stock/allocation register using fictional households. A responsible custodian would confirm usable quantities and each handover, with the public display showing only approved aggregate information.
Research basis: ODK Collect: managing draft, ready-to-send and sent forms · Solid FAQ: personal data sharing, storage and copies.
AI-generated future concept. Explore assistants preparing possible matches from consented needs and confirmed offers, then presenting them to the responsible operator. Future robot delivery would add its own permission and observed handover evidence before closing a request.
Research basis: NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0: core functions · Robots to the rescue in hazardous environments.
- ODK Collect: managing draft, ready-to-send and sent forms: AI transfer assessment: Structured collection can work without an immediate internet connection. Local difference to check: Food safety, welfare privacy, stock allocation, actual relief participation and completed delivery require the relevant people and professional processes.
- Rehearse duplicate allocation attempts, perishable stock, changed consent and a handover interrupted by a lost connection.
- Agree participating custodians, supported requests and professional review before accepting real household information.
Who reviews: Proposed relief logistics coordinator and participating resource custodian (unconfirmed)
Connected questions: DAT-01, SW-06
Work state: open. Assigned person or AI assistant: Ready to be assigned.
Research and alternatives can move ahead while connected decisions develop. Before acting on a choice, check the people, evidence and approved scope in People decide.
Growing capability together · Planning and design underway · People decide · Repository
Aura Disaster Resilience
- Start here
- The whole system
- About and topic slugs
- First choices
- All-weather design
- Questions
- Progress
- Working together
- People decide
- Professional review
- AI assistant jobs
- Council integration
- Council plan crosswalk
- Guardian IMS and QIT Plus
- Ecosystem
- Agreed direction
- Evidence
- Source library
- AI research and prompt
- Research sources
- Useful words/glossary
- Rights and discovery
Work areas
- Everyday service and disaster work
- Weather-ready kiosks and places
- Energy and backup power
- Connections and messages
- Information people can trust
- Software and device care
- Personal Aura and learning
- Place models and practice exercises
- Community and operating responsibility
- Budget and continuing support
- Tests and field learning
- Project connections
- Working together and human review