Question PHY 10

PHY-10 What drawings, checks and test results will people review before a design moves from workshop learning to a field trial or an outdoor public installation?

Start here · Questions · Progress · People decide

Why this matters

A shared review package turns workshop progress into a clear next decision.

What to bring back

Assemble a dated design package: measured drawings, part-fit checks, weather and damage tests, building instructions, inspection records and open questions. Record the reviewers, their decision and the conditions agreed for each type.

What we know so far

• Straddie Disaster Kiosk Pitch.pdf — reviewed source; public copy can be added through the evidence process
• Professional review and comparison of proposed improvements (When this work overlaps professional or public-authority responsibilities, compare the proposal and Luke's research with applicable industry/global best practice and relevant legal-engine sources. Record differences, reasonable improvements and deficiencies, with the responsible reviewer and response. Routine authorised drafting and wiki work can advance.)

AI-generated potential answers

For discussion and review · research checked 2026-10-20. These are AI-generated options and transfer assessments. The user's request and research method identify the source of this work. The source catalogue states what the references establish. The decision and approval record retains its own status.

Use one versioned design package for each physical type, tying drawings and exact parts to measured results. Progress from workshop mock-up to bounded field trial and then a public-installation proposal, with relevant professional comparisons, recorded differences and the responsible person's decision at each step.

Inspectable build and test dossier

AI-generated adaptation of an existing pattern. Assemble measured drawings, enclosure modifications, electrical documentation, access trials, software versions and maintenance records. Compare observed results against the agreed requirements and vendor conditions before asking for the next installation scope.

Research basis: D.D.A. guide: The ins and outs of access · Rittal protective roof SZ 2475000 · Permanently connected generators.

Living evidence twin

AI-generated future concept. Connect the physical equipment to a versioned digital twin so each replacement or altered setting prompts a targeted recheck. AI/SI could identify affected evidence and prepare a review pack while people retain the actual installation decisions.

Examples and local differences

• Mallacoota Area Grid Storage community updates: AI transfer assessment: AusNet's published functional testing and repair updates show the value of continuing evidence after commissioning. Local difference to check: Kiosk trials need their own acceptance measures and reviewers; another asset's tests cannot qualify them.

Evidence to bring back next

• List required reviewers and exact trial boundaries for each physical form.
• Check that every claimed result names the tested assembly, conditions and edition.

People and connected choices

Who reviews: Proposed service owner and appropriately qualified design reviewers; role and appointment awaiting confirmation

Connected questions: PHY-03, PHY-04, PHY-05, PHY-06, PHY-07, PHY-08, PHY-09

Work state: open. Assigned person or AI assistant: Ready to be assigned.

Research and alternatives can move ahead while connected decisions develop. Before acting on a choice, check the people, evidence and approved scope in People decide.