Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Interview with Chris Oh (Investor at GreenPoint Partners)

Chris Pondoc edited this page Jan 27, 2024 · 4 revisions

Overview

  • Name: Chris Oh
  • Background: Investor at GreenPoint Partners, formerly at TCV
  • Date: 1/26

Notes

See the raw notes from the meeting here.

Agriculture

  • Agriculture has a lot of diverse segments (OEM hardware manufacturers, seed and chemical, etc.). AgTech is just one of them
    • In particular, lots of growth in AgTech, Ag BioTech, and ESG
  • Competition dynamics in most segments is very concentrated, with a very small set of enterprises owning the majority of market share
    • Example: John Deere and its vehicles
    • Both an opportunity and a challenge
  • Note that even though there might be 80% small farms, over 80% of farmland acres are dominated by a small subset of people + companies. On the other hand, the rest of the 20% is owned by a small tailwind of folks
  • There's a core reason farming is undigitized: the average age of the farmer is 60
    • When you think about GTM sales journey, even B2B plays -- selling software to AgTech companies -- will have their end customer be farmers
  • Ultimately, in 10 years, there will be a generational shift towards younger farmers, which may help to increase technology adoption
  • One case study: Leaf API
    • Is like "Plaid for agriculture" -- collect unstandardized data from various hardware used in farming and allow startups and farmers to tap into this data using an API
    • Workflow: Farmer receives portal, farmer uploads data, Leaf processes it, AgTech companies (think crop rotation, yield prediction startups) can then use as API
  • Main issue with Leaf? Small TAM of AgTech companies that are actually serving to farmers
    • CO and firm didn't feel too comfortable yet that this generational shift is going to happen within holding period
    • As signals -- how many unicorns in AgTech? Is VC activity increasing at a good rate?
    • TAM or SAM only estimated around $400M, which is super tiny
  • Another important note: a farmer only has 20-30 shots in their life to make money
    • In other words: you can't f@#k s*)t up!
  • Conclusion: farmers are a tough crowd to sell software too, and B2B might be better, but we have to be cognizant of smaller TAM and dynamics (i.e., bargaining power when selling)
  • Resources: S2G Partners, Agreena

Supply Chain

  • Noted that there were a lot of interesting companies
    • Cybersecurity for IoT, freight document annotation, automobile repair management system, etc.
  • Reality: "supply chain" is very much an umbrella term
    • Can be around transportation, brokering, warehousing, delivery, and more
    • Can also cover supply chain on the ocean, in the air, and on land
    • Potential area: tailwind around reshoring/onshoring, as well as automation and robotics more broadly

Next Steps

  • Will probably not continue to explore the AgTech route... if too small TAM, might be good to stop our bets now
  • Continue to diversify thinking about supply chain

Table of Contents

For other information, check out our team's Google Drive. For a daily stream of thoughts, check this document.

Important Documents

Meetings

General Meetings

SGM Notes

Unusual Ventures Meetings

Kenja: A New Experience for Shopping

Initial Brainstorming

Needfinding

Customer Discovery Calls

Prototypes

Wine Marketplace Platform

Initial Brainstorming

Wine Needfinding

Prototypes

Miscellany

Clone this wiki locally