Skip to content

Minecraft The Exact Language Game

rg78803 edited this page Sep 10, 2026 · 1 revision

Minecraft β€” the exact language game: eight claims a player can make, and the court that grades them

Every position, reach test and collision in the world's most played game is floating point, and the shear has player-facing names: rubberbanding, ghost blocks, hits that do not register. This court reads the eight bytes the game sent as an exact dyadic rational, projects them once onto an integer lattice, and grades a player's claim there β€” the same answer on every machine, boundary included.

Status. Four claims adjudicate on the live public court today (reach, stand, fit, move-within). Four more β€” survive a fall, knockback, place a block, and line of sight β€” are proven in the court's own 67-arm selftest and are on the fleet's source (77c7f78a4); they reach the public court on the next cell-binary roll. Until then the live court answers those four with REFUSED_UNKNOWN_CLAIM, which is the honest answer for a claim it has not been taught.


Play it live

The card below is one real call to the public court. 4.5 blocks is exactly reachable β€” the boundary is included. The second card asks for 4.5 blocks plus one lattice unit (2⁻³² of a block): the court refuses. No epsilon, no "close enough" β€” the boundary is decided by the half-open box.

{"domain":"minecraft","role":"guide","title":"Can I reach that? β€” 4.5 blocks, the boundary itself","statement":{"mc_op":"adjudicate","mc_claim":"reaches","mc_budget":"survival","mc_window_blocks":"16","mc_centre_x":"0","mc_centre_y":"0","mc_centre_z":"0","mc_x":"0000000000000000","mc_y":"0000000000000000","mc_z":"0000000000000000","mc_to_x":"4012000000000000","mc_to_y":"0000000000000000","mc_to_z":"0000000000000000"}}
{"domain":"minecraft","role":"guide","title":"Can I reach that? β€” 4.5 blocks plus one lattice unit","statement":{"mc_op":"adjudicate","mc_claim":"reaches","mc_budget":"survival","mc_window_blocks":"16","mc_centre_x":"0","mc_centre_y":"0","mc_centre_z":"0","mc_x":"0000000000000000","mc_y":"0000000000000000","mc_z":"0000000000000000","mc_to_x":"4012000000040000","mc_to_y":"0000000000000000","mc_to_z":"0000000000000000"}}

The full playable board β€” every claim, both directions, on this page's own origin β€” is the games card: affine.earth/language-game/minecraft/games.html.

The eight claims

  1. Reach β€” can I reach that? The target is within reach, boundary included, or it is not.
  2. Stand on a block β€” am I standing on that? Feet on the face, not sunk a lattice unit into it.
  3. Fit through a gap β€” do I fit through there? The player box against the opening, exactly.
  4. Move within a tick β€” did I move that far? Displacement against the per-tick budget.
  5. Survive a fall β€” do I survive this fall? Fall distance on the lattice, the damage boundary exact.
  6. Knockback β€” does this hit knock me toward the danger? The knockback vector, not a rounded one.
  7. Place a block β€” can I place a block here? The placement box against the world's boxes.
  8. Line of sight β€” can the mob see me? Below.

Each is one case in one law: the claim is projected once onto the lattice and decided by integer comparison. The court also carries the moves that are not claims β€” ingest a position (where does the float world land?), the arrow that cannot tunnel (a swept segment, never sampled), co-play on the shared world, and a selftest in which the court proves its own law.

Line of sight β€” "Can the mob see me?"

A mob sees you if the sight line from its eye to yours is not blocked β€” and that line is a swept segment against the world, the same exact primitive as the arrow that cannot tunnel, read the other way: here a hit on the segment is what hides you. Minecraft raytraces this by sampling the ray, so a wall thinner than the gap between samples is seen straight through; this court tests the whole segment, so a thin wall never leaks a sight line. And the grazing case β€” the sight line running exactly flush with a block's face β€” is decided by the half-open box: flush is outside, so you are seen; one lattice unit further in and you are hidden.

Line of sight: a wall between you and the mob hides you

The court's response to a wall directly between you and the mob, quoted:

verdict          REFUSED_CLAIM_FAILS
mc_claim         can_see
narration        can the mob see me β€” no: a block is on the sight line β€” the mob cannot see you
line_clear       no
blocked_at_x     21474836480      ( = 5 Γ— 2Β³Β², the wall face )
block_fraction   21474836480/42949672960   ( = 1/2 exactly β€” the wall is halfway to you )

A wall off to the side or behind you does not touch the segment, so the mob sees you; a wall directly between returns REFUSED_CLAIM_FAILS β€” a block is on the sight line β€” the mob cannot see you β€” reported with the exact lattice point and fraction it was blocked at. The claim as the court receives it (positions are the game's own eight bytes, hex):

{"domain":"minecraft","role":"guide","mc_op":"adjudicate","mc_claim":"can_see",
 "mc_window_blocks":"16","mc_centre_x":"0","mc_centre_y":"0","mc_centre_z":"0",
 "mc_x":"0000000000000000","mc_y":"0000000000000000","mc_z":"0000000000000000",
 "mc_to_x":"4024000000000000","mc_to_y":"0000000000000000","mc_to_z":"0000000000000000",
 "mc_block_x":"5","mc_block_y":"0","mc_block_z":"0"}

The court proves its own law

Sixty-seven arms, every claim in both directions β€” the case that must pass and the case that must refuse β€” including the line-of-sight set: clear, blocked, behind the target, the sight line grazing a block's far face (seen: flush is outside), and one lattice unit further in (hidden).

The court's 67-arm selftest, every claim both directions

What we call, and what we refuse to call

We call: a claim about position in this game has an exact answer on the lattice, and the boundary cases β€” the reach exactly at 4.5, the sight line exactly flush with a face β€” are decided by the half-open box, not by an epsilon that differs between machines.

We refuse to call: anything about the game's servers, its anti-cheat, or any player. The subject under grading is the arithmetic, never the game.

Related

🧬 CURES β€” read in this order

Each step is the reason the next one exists. Nothing here is medical advice, and no page calls any medicine safe or unsafe.

1 Β· Why an exact safety screen at all

2 Β· The three libraries, which grow rather than close

3 Β· The maps β€” every place a molecule could act, counted

4 Β· One medicine at a time

  • Zilganersen β€” the first treatment for Alexander disease, screened on the real approved sequence
  • A drug an AI designed β€” rentosertib for pulmonary fibrosis, and exactly what our instruments reach
  • CAR-T, halted β€” the verdict a regulator could re-derive
  • N-of-1 antisense β€” the only safety net at a population of one
  • VERVE-102 β€” the off-target lattice a stranger can re-derive
  • PM359 β€” prime editing, certified before anyone is dosed
  • Del-Zota β€” the one safety question that can be made exact

5 Β· What keeps a disease alive, and what moves it

βš–οΈ How to read any page here

πŸ”¬ The method β€” exact against float, domain by domain

The same move every time: take a domain where a floating-point model is the accepted instrument, compute the same quantity in exact integers, and seal the cases where the two render opposite verdicts. The subject under grading is always the instrument, never the phenomenon.

⚑ Fusion β€” the energy case

🌍 The planet, and the sky

πŸ› Markets, money and risk

βš›οΈ Run a court yourself

πŸ“’ Program ledger β€” every study by lifecycle

A study appears here under the state its evidence has earned, and above under the question it answers. The two are different filings of the same work, on purpose.

βœ… LAW FROZEN Β· DATA SEALED

πŸ”΄ LIVE CLAIM β€” standing, not sealed

🌊 CHARTER Β· OPEN β€” the findings, published either way

β˜€οΈπŸŒ‘ Eclipse 2026 β€” Study 01, DATA SEALED

πŸ”¬ Discoveries and flows

Clone this wiki locally