IrcLog2009 01 07

William Deegan edited this page Jan 14, 2016 · 2 revisions
17:18:54  *      garyo-home (n=[chatzill@](mailto:chatzill@ has joined #scons 
17:22:57  *      stevenknight (n=[stevenkn@](mailto:stevenkn@ has joined #scons 
17:24:27  <stevenknight> hey all 
17:25:42  <garyo-home>   Hi, Steven. 
17:25:50  <garyo-home>   Hi, Greg (?) 
17:26:00  <garyo-home>   Anyone else here yet? 
17:26:15  <stevenknight> just got here myself 
17:26:23  <stevenknight> haven't seen anyone else 
17:26:39  <garyo-home>   Looks like the bug list should be pretty short this time. 
17:26:49  <stevenknight> yep 
17:37:21  <garyo-home>   Anyway... where's Greg? 
17:39:12  <stevenknight> well, Greg entered his comments, shall we dive in and do what we can? 
17:39:24  <garyo-home>   Yes, I was just thinking that. 
17:39:46  <garyo-home>   2279: how about I integrate it, and we give Arve commit rights on his next patch? 
17:40:13  <garyo-home>   Unless you have swig. 
17:40:09  <stevenknight> sounds good -- or actually, 
17:40:23  <stevenknight> i may have been thinking about someone different for commit rights 
17:40:35  <stevenknight> IIRC Greg's been talking with Ben Webb about becoming the SWIG guru 
17:40:49  <stevenknight> I do have swig installed so could do at least a sanity check on it 
17:41:02  <garyo-home>   Oh, right.  Maybe we should let Ben check it then. 
17:41:15  <stevenknight> okay, i'll follow up w/Greg and/or Ben 
17:41:28  <stevenknight> and integrate it myself if neither of them has cycles 
17:41:25  <garyo-home>   good. 
17:41:30  <stevenknight> done 
17:41:43  <garyo-home>   2281: I think you're right, error if no action. 
17:42:04  <stevenknight> okay, 2.0 p3... me? 
17:42:10  <stevenknight> since i spoke up... 
17:42:12  <garyo-home>   yes. 
17:42:33  <stevenknight> 2281:  2.0, p3, sk 
17:42:33  <stevenknight> done 
17:43:00  <stevenknight> 2282:  1.3, p3, who? 
17:43:12  <garyo-home>   right, who.  I can do it, or maybe Greg would. 
17:43:31  <garyo-home>   Heck, count me in, I've done a bunch of doc already. 
17:43:39  <stevenknight> okay 
17:43:43  <stevenknight> 2282:  1.3, p3, garyo 
17:43:44  <stevenknight> done 
17:43:45  <stevenknight> thanks 
17:44:04  <stevenknight> 2283: 
17:44:11  <garyo-home>   2283: we need to actually see the patch before we can do anything. 
17:44:15  <stevenknight> do you see any significant downside to going with it? 
17:44:23  <stevenknight> i looked and it seemed pretty reasonable to me 
17:44:38  <garyo-home>   Good -- no, as long as it doesn't break anything, why not. 
17:44:52  <stevenknight> i wasn't sure what Greg's concerns are w.r.t. "special-case cross-compiling" 
17:45:15  <garyo-home>   I think he wants to specify cross-compilation at a toolchain level in a nice way. 
17:45:34  <stevenknight> i see 
17:45:07  <stevenknight> 2.x p3 seem reasonable? 
17:45:13  <stevenknight> right now those don't need to be assigned 
17:45:29  <stevenknight> and we're going to have to have a big assignment party some time post 1.3 for those 
17:45:38  <garyo-home>   Yes, 2.x for all feature requests is good. 
17:45:42  <stevenknight> not just as an implementation within a specific tool, right 
17:45:47  <garyo-home>   right. 
17:45:48  <stevenknight> okay 
17:45:54  <stevenknight> 2283:  2.x, p3, TBD 
17:45:57  <stevenknight> done 
17:46:16  <stevenknight> 2284: 
17:46:22  <garyo-home>   as you say, it's a dup. 
17:46:24  <stevenknight> I'll DUP to 1914 
17:46:29  <garyo-home>   good! 
17:46:34  <stevenknight> cool, done with the current issues 
17:46:35  <garyo-home>   that was quick. 
17:46:39  <stevenknight> nice 
17:47:10  <garyo-home>   I spent some time on the 2005Q2 issues too. 
17:47:25  <stevenknight> excellent, let's see if we can get through those 
17:47:40  <garyo-home>   1140: close as WORKSFORME. 
17:47:48  <stevenknight> 1140:  done 
17:47:50  <garyo-home>   1185: consensus WORKSFORME. 
17:48:08  <stevenknight> 1185:  done 
17:48:21  <stevenknight> 1187:  research, sk 
17:48:25  <garyo-home>   yup. 
17:48:42  <stevenknight> 1188:  research, sk 
17:48:47  <stevenknight> close if confirm fix 
17:49:03  <garyo-home>   I actually tried 1188 and it worked.  ? 
17:49:11  <garyo-home>   But I had to make my own testcase. 
17:49:17  <stevenknight> do you still have it? 
17:49:46  <garyo-home>   Maybe.  It was just foo.c conditionally including foo.h, iirc. 
17:50:11  <stevenknight> with appropriate case change in the extension, i take it 
17:50:31  <garyo-home>   case change? 
17:50:34  <stevenknight> you have to get it stored in the .sconsign file and then run again 
17:50:47  <stevenknight> d'oh!  scratch my case change comment 
17:50:52  <stevenknight> thinking about the next issue 
17:50:55  <garyo-home>   :-) 
17:51:02  <garyo-home>   Anyway, whatever you find there is OK. 
17:51:22  <stevenknight> if you still have the test case handy, send it my way or attach it as a starting point 
17:51:30  <garyo-home>   Either close or post testcase and retriage.  I'll see if I have the testcase. 
17:51:49  <stevenknight> even if it's already fixed, i'd feel better checking in a test to make sure it stays fixed 
17:52:07  <garyo-home>   Good point. 
17:52:22  <stevenknight> 1188:  research, sk, garyo to see if he has his test case 
17:52:23  <stevenknight> done 
17:52:29  <stevenknight> 1193: 
17:52:40  <stevenknight> 1193:  1.3, p2, sk 
17:52:41  <garyo-home>   1193, p3 sk? 
17:52:46  <garyo-home>   yes 
17:52:52  <stevenknight> done 
17:53:04  <garyo-home>   1194 you already closed. 
17:53:05  <stevenknight> 1194:  already fixed 
17:53:28  <stevenknight> 1198:   
17:53:40  <garyo-home>   1198: do you really have to set PYTHONPATH if you install as non-root? 
17:53:50  <stevenknight> not sure about that 
17:53:59  <stevenknight> but maybe i'm misunderstanding the bug 
17:53:59  <garyo-home>   I don't think so, I do that on one of my Linux boxes where I don't have root and I don't think I set PYTHONPATH. 
17:54:14  <stevenknight> i don't set it either 
17:54:29  <stevenknight> but it sounds like the underlying problem is we don't do the right thing with installing the man page 
17:55:03  <garyo-home>   Right, forgot about that part.  Should be a separate issue IMHO, but anyway. 
17:55:20  <stevenknight> ah, okay 
17:55:23  <garyo-home>   He wants us to install the man pages anyway.  That's reasonable. 
17:55:46  <stevenknight> should I just re-title this issue, or open up a separate one? 
17:56:10  <garyo-home>   I'd close this one w/ explanation, and open a new one with a reference to this old one. 
17:56:17  <stevenknight> okay, i'll do that 
17:56:22  <garyo-home>   great. 
17:56:36  <garyo-home>   That's that! 
17:56:41  <stevenknight> 1198:  open new issue, 2.0, p3 ? 
17:56:49  <stevenknight> done 
17:56:51  <stevenknight> excellent 
17:57:06  <stevenknight> we're actually beginning to get this "consensus" thing down...  :-) 
17:57:15  <garyo-home>   Yes, it works well. 
17:58:04  <garyo-home>   There's probably a lot of scheduling discussions we could have right now, but I am pretty burned out and would like to go to bed. 
17:57:59  <stevenknight> looks like you haven't had a chance to tackle 2005q1, shall we just push that off to next time? 
17:58:07  <stevenknight> and go get other things done... :-) 
17:58:13  <garyo-home>   Yes, and let's do 2005q1 next time. 
17:58:14  <stevenknight> okay, sounds good 
17:58:37  <stevenknight> i'm going to try to get sgk_batch integrated into trunk and then kick out a checkpoint so it gets air time 
17:58:43  <stevenknight> and then tackle integrating vs_revamp 
17:58:57  <stevenknight> with another checkpoint for that 
17:58:56  <garyo-home>   +1 on both of those.  I will test them hard! 
17:59:22  <garyo-home>   I'll be able to test on my home Windows box once vs_revamp is out (I have VS2008 here) 
17:59:30  <stevenknight> cool 
18:00:03  <stevenknight> we've been working on a signfiicant refactoring of .vcproj / .sln generation 
18:00:34  <garyo-home>   OK, not my particular cup o' tea but some people like it. 
18:00:37  <stevenknight> still a ways off, so not for 1.3, but I think it'll come with some good stuff for hard-core Windows developers 
18:00:41  <stevenknight> yep 
18:01:25  <garyo-home>   OK Steven, see you later. 
18:01:39  <stevenknight> garyo-home:  good night, thanks again 
18:18:03  *      stevenknight has quit ("Leaving") 
18:33:38  *      garyo-home has quit ("[ChatZilla](ChatZilla) 0.9.84 [Firefox 3.0.5/2008120122]") 

Clone this wiki locally
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Press h to open a hovercard with more details.